Network Segmentation Policy Translation for Dynamic IoT Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional network segmentation methods are inadequate for managing dynamic and unpredictable environments, such as those with a large number of IoT devices and varying user mobility, due to their reliance on static IP address schemes and manual tagging processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that enables dynamic segmentation management, including translation of configuration information to enforce segmentation policies seamlessly across various enforcement points, while being agnostic to IP addressing schemes and allowing for granular, adaptive, and flexible solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static IP address schemes and manual tagging processes are used for network segmentation, then network security can be maintained in traditional environments, but the system becomes inadequate for managing dynamic and unpredictable environments with IoT devices and user mobility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamic environmentsVSAvoidcomplexity of segmentation management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic segmentation by transitioning from static IP-based segmentation to a system that automatically adapts segmentation policies based on real-time network conditions, device types, and user mobility patterns. The system continuously monitors network traffic and dynamically adjusts segmentation rules without requiring manual reconfiguration, enabling effective management of IoT devices and mobile users while maintaining network security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If granular and flexible segmentation policies are implemented, then network security is improved and risk of device compromises is reduced, but the configuration and management becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork securityVSAvoidcomplexity of policy configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service segmentation by enabling the system to automatically generate, configure, and enforce segmentation policies based on predefined criteria and real-time network observations. The system autonomously performs device classification, policy generation, and enforcement point configuration without requiring manual intervention, thereby achieving granular security control while simplifying management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors network traffic, device behavior, and segmentation policy effectiveness. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts and optimizes segmentation policies to maintain high security standards while adapting to changing network conditions, reducing the need for manual policy configuration and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If segmentation policies are independently designed and configured, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but the translation and enforcement across various enforcement points becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of segmentation policiesVSAvoidease of policy enforcement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal segmentation enforcement by designing a unified policy translation mechanism that can enforce segmentation policies across multiple types of enforcement points (firewalls, switches, routers, cloud security services) using a common configuration framework. The system translates high-level segmentation policies into device-specific configurations automatically, enabling flexible policy design while simplifying enforcement across heterogeneous network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary policy translation layer that sits between the segmentation policy design interface and the various enforcement points in the network. This intermediary automatically translates and adapts segmentation policies to the specific requirements and configuration formats of different enforcement point types, thereby maintaining policy flexibility while easing the complexity of enforcement across diverse network devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12224904B2Segmentation management including translation
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12224904B2 patent drawing
  • US12224904B2 patent drawing
  • US12224904B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and related technologies for segmentation management are described. The segmentation management may include visualization, configuration including translation, simulation, or a combination thereof of one or more segmentation policies. In certain aspects, a segmentation policy is accessed and a segmentation rule is determined based on the segmentation policy, wherein the segmentation rule is based on a characteristic of an entity determined without the use of an agent. An enforcement point associated with the segmentation rule may be determined, where the enforcement point is communicatively coupled to a network. The segmentation rule may be translated into a configuration associated with the enforcement point and the configuration communicated to the enforcement point.