Segmentation Output Quality Prediction From Detection Score Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing detection and segmentation algorithms often produce poor quality outputs, especially when analyzing data far from their training dataset distribution, leading to reduced user confidence in their reliability.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyzes the intermediate output of a detection and segmentation algorithm at multiple operating points to compute features, using a classifier to predict whether the final output will meet a detection precision threshold, preventing poor quality outputs from being shown to the end user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If detection and segmentation algorithms are applied to data far from training dataset distribution, then the algorithms can handle diverse input scenarios, but the output quality deteriorates and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse input scenariosVSAvoidoutput quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by computing features from the detection score map at multiple operating points before final segmentation. This intermediate analysis allows the system to predict output quality in advance and identify cases where the algorithm may fail, enabling proactive quality control before poor results are generated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary quality assessment mechanism that analyzes the detection score map at multiple operating points. This intermediary analysis acts as a mediator between the detection stage and final segmentation, providing quality predictions that prevent poor outputs from being generated in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system analyzes detection score map at multiple operating points to compute features, then the quality prediction accuracy improves, but the processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality prediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting specific operating points for analysis rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible thresholds. By computing features at strategically chosen operating points, the system achieves sufficient quality prediction accuracy without the excessive computational burden of complete analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the operating points (thresholds) at which the detection score map is analyzed. By computing features across multiple threshold values, the system captures different aspects of detection quality, improving prediction accuracy while managing computational complexity through selective parameter variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system prevents poor quality outputs from being displayed, then user confidence in reliability improves, but the productivity decreases due to additional quality checking steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser confidence in algorithm reliabilityVSAvoidoutput generation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing quality assessment during the detection stage before final segmentation is generated. By computing features and making quality predictions at this intermediate stage, the system identifies poor-quality cases early, preventing unnecessary processing and avoiding the generation of low-confidence outputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12555211B2Detecting unacceptable detection and segmentation algorithm output
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12555211B2 patent drawing
  • US12555211B2 patent drawing
  • US12555211B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach for automatically detecting whether an output of a detection and segmentation algorithm is of an acceptable quality, a processor receives an image. A processor applies a detection stage of a detection and segmentation algorithm to the image. A processor computes a set of features from a detection score map output by the detection stage of the detection and segmentation algorithm by analyzing the detection score map at more than one different operating points. A processor inputs the set of features into a classifier that predicts whether a final output of the detection and segmentation algorithm will be of an acceptable quality, wherein the acceptable quality is defined based on whether a detection precision threshold has been reached. A processor receives an output of the classifier.