Segmented Air Guide Cassette for Radiator Flap Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiator cooling devices with movable flaps face challenges in compact vehicle front designs, including fragility, high replacement costs, and lack of standardization across vehicle models, which affects aerodynamic efficiency and CO2 emissions.

Innovation Solution

A two-part air guide cooling device with a removable autonomous cassette for the concealment shutter, allowing for easier adaptation to various vehicle models, where the cassette can be optionally included or excluded, and the fixing means for the front and rear parts trap the cassette in place, ensuring secure positioning and standardization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If movable flaps are positioned in or close to the air inlet grille, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but the flaps become fragile and susceptible to damage from shocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic drag coefficientVSAvoidflap durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The air guide is divided into two separable parts: a front part that can be positioned close to the air inlet for aerodynamic efficiency, and a rear part containing the flap mechanism. This segmentation allows the front part to optimize airflow while the rear part protects the flaps from direct impact exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The air guide structure acts as an intermediary between the air inlet and the flaps, providing a protective channel that reduces direct exposure to shocks while maintaining aerodynamic flow paths. The guide's geometry mediates between the conflicting requirements of proximity to inlet and protection from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If movable flaps are integrated into the technical front face, then aerodynamic efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to custom sheet metal design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic drag coefficientVSAvoidfront face integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air guide is designed as a universal component that can be adapted to different vehicle models without requiring custom integration into each front face design. The standardized air guide module can be mounted on various vehicle architectures, reducing manufacturing complexity and enabling economies of scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of integrating flaps directly into custom sheet metal front faces for each vehicle model, the invention uses a standardized air guide template that can be replicated across multiple models. This copying approach maintains aerodynamic efficiency while avoiding the complexity of custom manufacturing for each variant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Strength

If the air guide is constructed as a single integrated piece, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability to various vehicle models decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair guide structural strengthVSAvoidvehicle model compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The air guide is segmented into a front part and a rear part that can be separately manufactured and then assembled. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity through standardized connection interfaces that ensure strength upon assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular air guide structure allows the rear part containing the flap mechanism to be nested within or attached to the front part. This nested configuration enables adaptability to different vehicle models while maintaining structural strength through the hierarchical assembly of standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Force

If concealment shutters are placed at the air inlet level without recoil, then impact energy absorption is improved, but the shutters are exposed to all shocks including low-speed impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidshutter exposure to shocks
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter system is segmented and positioned within the rear part of the air guide, separated from the front air inlet area. This segmentation allows the shutters to contribute to impact energy absorption at their designated position while being protected from direct exposure to low-speed shocks that occur at the front air inlet level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The air guide structure provides beforehand cushioning by positioning the shutters in a protected location within the rear part, shielded by the front part's structure. This prior protective arrangement allows the shutters to perform their impact energy absorption function without being directly exposed to harmful shocks from the front.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP2640591B1Cooling device having air guide for a radiator of an automobile engine
Publication Date: 2015.09.02 RENAULT SA
  • EP2640591B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2640591B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2640591B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

According to the invention, in a device for cooling a radiator, comprising an air guide (8) attached to structural portions of the vehicle and a device (20) having movable air-blocking flaps, the air guide (8) is made of at least two separate portions, i.e. a front portion (10.1) and a rear portion (8.1), respectively, which are provided with means for mutual attachment, said rear portion (8.1) being attached to said structural portions and comprising a receiving area adapted for receiving said device having blocking flaps (20), the entire assembly being held in place by means of the attachment of the front portion (10.1) onto the rear portion (8.1).