Segmented Airfoil Design for Wind Turbines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wind turbines face limitations in blade size and cost due to structural requirements, maintenance challenges, and inefficiencies caused by rigid designs and complex pitch control systems, as well as issues with alignment and vibration of perimeter rims, which affect energy optimization and output.

Innovation Solution

A segmented wind turbine design featuring self-positioning airfoils with adjustable angles of attack, carried by cables between a hub and rim, allowing for independent rotation and automatic adjustment to wind direction and speed, eliminating the need for traditional blade pitch control systems and reducing maintenance complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional rigid blade design is used, then structural strength is maintained, but manufacturing cost and maintenance complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade structural strengthVSAvoidblade manufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple rigid segments connected by flexible joints. Each segment can be manufactured separately and assembled, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining overall structural strength through the segmented architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade incorporates flexible joints that allow dynamic adjustment of segment angles during operation. This enables the blade to adapt to varying wind conditions, optimizing performance while using lighter, less expensive materials compared to a fully rigid blade of equivalent strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If blade length is increased to capture more wind energy, then power generation increases, but centrifugal forces and bending forces increase requiring stronger and more expensive blades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generationVSAvoidblade strength requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the blade into multiple sections connected by flexible joints, the structure can span longer distances without requiring proportionally increased material strength. Each segment supports only its local load, and the flexible joints allow the structure to adapt to centrifugal and bending forces, enabling longer blade lengths at reduced cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible joints enable the blade to dynamically adjust its configuration in response to rotational forces and wind loading. This dynamic adaptation reduces peak stresses in the structure, allowing longer blades to be constructed with lighter, less expensive materials while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If traditional pitch control systems are used, then blade angle optimization is achieved, but device complexity and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy capture efficiencyVSAvoidpitch control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible jointed structure enables the blade segments to automatically adjust their angles in response to wind conditions and rotational dynamics. This self-adjusting mechanism eliminates the need for complex motorized pitch control systems, reducing device complexity and maintenance requirements while maintaining energy capture efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The dynamic flexibility of the jointed blade structure allows automatic adaptation to optimal angles of attack under varying operating conditions. This passive dynamic control replaces active mechanical pitch control systems, simplifying the overall device while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If perimeter rim is made rigid to maintain alignment, then generator alignment is improved, but vibration and stress increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenerator alignmentVSAvoidvibration and stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The perimeter rim incorporates flexible elements that allow controlled movement and vibration absorption. This dynamic design maintains generator alignment through adaptive adjustment rather than rigid constraint, reducing stress and harmful vibrations while preserving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances energy capture by optimizing blade angle and pitch automatically, reduces maintenance needs, and simplifies transportation and installation, while minimizing drag and vibration, leading to improved efficiency and reduced operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of airfoils rotatably carried by the cable and disposed between the hub and the rim

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS11359608B2Segmented airfoil design for guide wires
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 BARBER GERALD L
  • US11359608B2 patent drawing
  • US11359608B2 patent drawing
  • US11359608B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is an improved wind turbine comprising: a wind turbine wheel having a hub, a rim and a cable extending between the hub and the rim; a set of airfoils rotatably carried by the cable and disposed between the hub and the rim; a cinch attached to the cable and disposed between adjacent airfoils; and, an upturned section included in at least one airfoil in the set of airfoils and disposed at a trailing edge of the airfoil wherein each airfoil has a different angle of attack relative to an adjacent airfoil.