Segmented Arc Blade Geometry for Pruning Force Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hand-operated cutting tools face challenges in reducing the force required to cut branches of varying diameters, as existing designs often necessitate significant effort and motion to efficiently prune both small and large diameter vegetation.

Innovation Solution

The design features a hand-operated cutting tool with handles pivotally connected, where the cutting edges of the hook and blade are formed along overlapping concave and convex arcs of different diameters, allowing for efficient cutting of branches by distributing force effectively and reducing the required effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standard single-arc blade structure is used, then the design is simple, but significant force and hand movement are required to cut branches of varying diameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce required to cut branchesVSAvoidblade structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting blade is segmented into multiple zones with different arc radii along its length. Each zone corresponds to a different branch diameter range, allowing the blade to efficiently cut branches of varying sizes without requiring excessive force or hand movement. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by making the blade structure more complex in a targeted way that directly improves ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the blade are given different local qualities through varying arc radii. The blade transitions from a single uniform arc to multiple zones with progressively changing curvature, where each local section is optimized for cutting branches of specific diameter ranges. This local differentiation allows the blade to maintain optimal cutting geometry across various branch sizes, reducing the force required during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single-arc blade structure is used, then the blade design is straightforward, but the tool cannot efficiently handle branches of various diameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to cut branches of various diametersVSAvoidblade geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple functional zones along its length, with each zone having a different arc radius optimized for specific branch diameter ranges. This segmentation enables the single blade to adapt to various branch sizes, providing versatility without requiring multiple interchangeable blades. The increased geometric complexity is localized to the blade profile, maintaining overall device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade geometry transitions from static and uniform to dynamic and variable, with arc radii that change along the blade length. This dynamic geometry allows the blade to automatically adapt to different branch diameters during operation, enhancing versatility. The complexity is confined to the blade's geometric profile rather than the overall mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If significant force is applied to cut larger diameter branches, then cutting capability is improved, but hand fatigue increases and operation becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting force applied to branchVSAvoidhand movement and pressure required
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The blade employs multiple curved arcs with progressively varying radii instead of a straight or single-curved edge. This spherical/curved geometry allows the blade to conform to and efficiently cut branches of different diameters by distributing the cutting force more effectively. The curvature optimization reduces the peak force required and minimizes hand movement, thereby reducing operator fatigue while maintaining cutting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The blade's geometric parameters, specifically the arc radius, are varied along the blade length to optimize cutting performance for different branch sizes. By changing the curvature parameter progressively across different zones, the blade can cut both small and large diameter branches with reduced force requirements. This parameter optimization directly improves ease of operation while maintaining adequate cutting force where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8910386B2Multiple cut zone blade assembly for a hand operated cutting tool
Publication Date: 2014.12.16 CORONA CLIPPER INC
  • US8910386B2 patent drawing
  • US8910386B2 patent drawing
  • US8910386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hand pruner having a first and second handle, the first handle having a hook, formed at a far end, the second handle having a cutting blade formed at the far end. The first handle and hook and second handle and blade pivotally connected for movement with respect to each other. The blade and second handle having a cup formed between the blade and second handle. The hook and first handle having a cup formed between the hook and first handle. The cutting edge of the hook is formed along two concave intersecting arcs of different diameters, the smaller diameter arc located next to the pivot. The cutting edge of the blade is formed along two convex intersecting arcs having diameters that complement the two concave arcs in the hook cutting edge.