Segmented Safety Barrier for Selective Work Cell Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In automated robotic manufacturing facilities, the need for operators to enter the work cell area for maintenance or repairs requires shutting down all automated machinery, significantly reducing manufacturing efficiency and increasing production time.

Innovation Solution

A safety architecture with a barrier that allows personnel to access nonfunctioning motion platforms or positioning machines through openings while other machines continue to operate, using movable panels controlled by a system that locks and unlocks access based on machine functionality, enabling maintenance without halting production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the safety barrier is made completely sealed to ensure operator safety, then operator safety is improved, but operator accessibility for maintenance is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidoperator accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The safety barrier is segmented into multiple sections with selective openings rather than being completely sealed. This allows operators to access specific nonfunctioning machines through designated openings while other barrier sections remain closed, maintaining overall safety while enabling targeted maintenance access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A control system acts as an intermediary between the safety barrier and operator access requests. The control system evaluates the functional status of machines and selectively opens or closes barrier sections based on real-time operational data, mediating between safety requirements and maintenance needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all automated machinery is shut down for operator entry into work cell area, then operator safety is improved, but manufacturing productivity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of shutting down all automated machinery globally, the system applies safety measures locally only to the specific machine or area being accessed. The control system identifies nonfunctioning machines and opens barrier sections adjacent to them, while other functioning machines continue operating without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial shutdown action by isolating only the nonfunctioning machine rather than shutting down the entire automated system. This partial action allows operators to safely access and maintain specific machines while the rest of the production system continues at full capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of repair

If the barrier is made fully accessible for maintenance operations, then ease of repair is improved, but operator safety is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessibilityVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety barrier transitions from a static completely closed structure to a dynamic system with selectively openable sections. The control system dynamically adjusts barrier section states based on real-time machine operational status, allowing the barrier to be open only when and where maintenance is needed while remaining closed elsewhere to maintain safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If multiple opening mechanisms are added to the barrier for selective access, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidbarrier control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors machine operational status, determines which barrier sections should be open or closed, controls the opening/closing mechanisms, and coordinates operator access requests. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier opening mechanisms are integrated within the existing barrier structure rather than being separate external additions. The control system is nested within the automated manufacturing system's existing control architecture, allowing selective access through a unified hierarchical control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP3988262B1Safety architecture for an automated work cell
Publication Date: 2024.11.27 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3988262B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3988262B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3988262B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Safety architecture for an automated work cell provides a barrier separating a work cell area from an operator or personnel area. The safety architecture enables personnel to conduct routine interactions with nonfunctioning motion platforms or positioning machines located in the work cell area through openings in the barrier separating the personnel area from the work cell area while other motion platforms or positioning machines in the work cell area continues to function.