Segmented Bonded Joint Structure for Crack-Tolerant Load Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current structurally bonded arrangements in rotorcrafts face challenges in demonstrating damage-tolerance and preventing crack propagation in bonded joints, due to manufacturing imperfections and stress concentration, which can lead to sudden rupture and loss of load-bearing capability, with existing methods struggling to integrate effective crack-stopping features across the entire bond line.

Innovation Solution

A structurally bonded arrangement is designed with a plurality of separated sub-bondings instead of a single bond line, acting as crack stoppers to prevent crack growth and enhance damage tolerance, allowing for fail-safe characteristics and reduced sensitivity to local cracks and defects, thereby eliminating the need for additional crack-stopping elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single continuous bond line is used in a bonded joint, then load transfer capability is improved, but crack propagation risk increases and damage tolerance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoiddamage tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bond line is divided into multiple discrete sub-bondings separated by gaps or non-bonded regions. These sub-bondings are distributed along the bonding area, creating a segmented structure that maintains load transfer capability while preventing continuous crack propagation. The segmentation allows the bond line to tolerate localized damage without catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If additional rivets are added as crack-stopping features, then crack propagation is prevented, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack stopping capabilityVSAvoidbonded joint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The crack-stopping function is merged into the bonding structure itself by creating gaps or non-bonded regions within the adhesive layer. This integration eliminates the need for separate mechanical crack-stopping features like rivets, while still providing effective crack propagation prevention. The bonding structure simultaneously provides both load transfer and crack stopping functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If the bonding area is increased to improve load transfer, then strength is improved, but stress concentration and crack risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload transfer capabilityVSAvoidstress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The bonding area is segmented into multiple sub-bondings with gaps between them. This segmentation distributes the applied load across multiple discrete bonding zones, reducing stress concentration in any single area. The gaps act as stress relief zones, preventing the buildup of high stresses that would lead to crack initiation and propagation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If regular inspection methods are used for bonded joints, then inspection process is simple, but defect detection quality is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection simplicityVSAvoiddefect detection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gaps or non-bonded regions in the segmented bond line create visible visual indicators that facilitate defect detection. These gaps provide natural reference points and contrast that make it easier to identify bonding defects, crack locations, and inspection anomalies using visual or non-destructive testing methods, thereby improving inspection quality without significantly increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240308689A1Structurally bonded arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • US20240308689A1 patent drawing
  • US20240308689A1 patent drawing
  • US20240308689A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A structurally bonded arrangement comprising: an interconnecting component; a first component with a first connecting area that is rigidly connected to the interconnecting component; and a second component with a second connecting area that is structurally bonded to the interconnecting component in an associated bonding area; wherein a plurality of separated sub-bondings is formed in the associated bonding area between the second component and the interconnecting component.