Segmented Bumper Rib for PET Container Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic containers, particularly PET containers, face challenges in maintaining structural integrity and aesthetic appeal when subjected to vacuum pressures and impact forces during hot filling and handling, as traditional rigid bumpers can buckle or crease, leading to deformation and loss of label protection.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates segmented bumpers with recessed portions in the shoulder and base regions, allowing for flexible absorption of impact forces without permanent deformation, and omits vacuum panels in the sidewall to maintain a smooth appearance and increased rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional rigid bumpers are used in PET containers, then structural support is improved, but the container becomes susceptible to buckling and creasing under impact forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidresistance to buckling and creasing
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bumper is divided into multiple segments along the container's longitudinal axis, with each segment capable of independent deformation. This segmentation allows the bumper to absorb impact forces through controlled localized buckling rather than creating permanent creases in the container wall, thus maintaining both structural support and resistance to damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bumper structure incorporates regions with varying wall thicknesses and material densities along its length. Thicker regions provide structural support while thinner regions are designed to deform preferentially under impact, changing the mechanical parameters of the container to balance strength and impact resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If vacuum panels are added to the sidewall to accommodate vacuum pressures, then structural integrity under vacuum is improved, but the container's aesthetic appearance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity under vacuumVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum accommodation function is merged with the existing bumper structure rather than adding separate vacuum panels to the sidewall. The bumper's segmented design inherently provides vacuum relief capability while maintaining a smooth, aesthetically pleasing container exterior without visible panels or deformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum panel feature is extracted from the sidewall surface and relocated to the bumper structure at the container's end. This extraction allows the sidewall to remain smooth and aesthetically pleasing while the bumper, which is less visible and structurally designed for deformation, handles the vacuum pressure accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If the amount of plastic is reduced to lower material costs, then manufacturing cost is improved, but container rigidity and structural integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial costVSAvoidcontainer rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reducing plastic throughout the container, the design applies varying wall thicknesses strategically - thinner walls in non-critical areas to reduce material cost, and thicker, reinforced walls in the bumper and other structurally critical areas to maintain rigidity and strength where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively absorbs impact forces and accommodates vacuum pressures, preventing buckling or creasing while maintaining structural integrity and aesthetic appeal, enhancing the container's stability and label protection during handling and shipping.

Implementation Method 1

allowing for flexible absorption of impact forces without permanent deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

accommodates vacuum pressures, preventing buckling or creasing while maintaining structural integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure resistance: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS7857157B2Container having segmented bumper rib
Publication Date: 2010.12.28 AMCOR RIGID PACKAGING USA LLC
  • US7857157B2 patent drawing
  • US7857157B2 patent drawing
  • US7857157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plastic container has an upper portion including a mouth defining an opening into the container. A shoulder region extends from the upper portion. A sidewall portion extends from the shoulder region to a base portion. The base portion closes off an end of the container. An upper bumper portion is defined at a transition between the shoulder region and the sidewall portion. The upper bumper portion includes an upper raised wall defining a maximum width of the container. The upper raised wall includes a recessed portion formed therein. A lower bumper portion is defined at a transition between the base portion and the sidewall portion. The lower bumper portion includes a lower raised wall defining the maximum width of the container. The lower raised wall includes a recessed portion formed therein.