Segmented Ceiling Fan Blade Airfoil Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ceiling fans have limited efficiency in moving air, leading to higher energy costs due to suboptimal aerodynamic design of their blades, which results in increased energy consumption for the same airflow volume compared to traditional designs.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an airfoil-shaped blade with distinct cross-sections along its span-wise direction, including a lifting cross-section, a flat section, and a transitional section, optimized to reduce aerodynamic drag and enhance airflow efficiency while maintaining a traditional aesthetic appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional flat-bladed ceiling fan design is used, then manufacturing simplicity and traditional aesthetic are maintained, but aerodynamic efficiency and airflow volume are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow volumeVSAvoidblade cross-section complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into three distinct cross-sectional sections along its span: a root section with an airfoil cross-section for optimal aerodynamic performance, a middle section with a transitional cross-section that gradually changes from airfoil to flat, and a tip section with a flat cross-section for aesthetic purposes. This segmentation allows each portion of the blade to serve different functions - the airfoil section maximizes airflow generation while the flat section maintains traditional appearance, resolving the contradiction between aerodynamic efficiency and aesthetic simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If airfoil-shaped blade design is implemented, then aerodynamic efficiency and airflow velocity are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow velocityVSAvoidblade manufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The blade employs local quality by applying the airfoil cross-section only to the root section where aerodynamic forces are most critical for generating airflow. The middle section uses a transitional cross-section that gradually simplifies the geometry, and the tip section uses a flat cross-section that is simplest to manufacture. This localized application of complex geometry only where necessary maximizes airflow velocity while minimizing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If airfoil cross-section is used throughout the blade span, then aerodynamic performance is maximized, but traditional aesthetic appearance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into three cross-sectional sections along its span: a root section with an airfoil cross-section for optimal aerodynamic performance, a middle section with a transitional cross-section that gradually changes from airfoil to flat, and a tip section with a flat cross-section for aesthetic purposes. This segmentation allows each portion of the blade to serve different functions - the airfoil section maximizes airflow generation while the flat section maintains traditional appearance, resolving the contradiction between aerodynamic efficiency and aesthetic simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade employs local quality by applying the airfoil cross-section only to the root section where aerodynamic forces are most critical for generating airflow. The middle section uses a transitional cross-section that gradually simplifies the geometry, and the tip section uses a flat cross-section that is simplest to manufacture. This localized application of complex geometry only where necessary maximizes airflow velocity while minimizing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design increases airflow volume by up to 30% and air velocity by 7-40% compared to traditional flat-bladed ceiling fans, while reducing energy costs and maintaining a visually appealing, unadorned bottom surface.

Implementation Method 1

The airfoil body comprises at least three distinct cross sections along the span-wise direction: a first cross section comprising a flat lower surface and a lifting cross section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

optimized to reduce aerodynamic drag and enhance airflow efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS11927196B2Ceiling fan blade
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 HUNTER FAN COMPANY
  • US11927196B2 patent drawing
  • US11927196B2 patent drawing
  • US11927196B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ceiling fan or blade thereof can include a fan motor for rotating the blade. The blade can include an airfoil body having an outer surface extending between a leading edge and a trailing edge, and a root and a tip. The blade can be separated into three distinct cross sections including a first cross section as a lifting cross section, a second cross section as a flat cross section, and a third cross section as a transition section between the first and second cross sections.