Segmented Four-Bar Closure Mechanism for Jam-Resistant Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aperture-type closure mechanisms are prone to contamination, jamming, and have unfavorable flow profiles, making them unsuitable for applications involving viscous or doughy substances, and they often require complex and costly constructions.

Innovation Solution

A closure mechanism utilizing a four-bar linkage with pivoting levers and a cam mechanism, where segments move independently and synchronously, allowing for a nearly circular opening without slots, and can be closed fluid-tightly or gas-tightly, using a cam mechanism and pivoting levers to ensure smooth operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If segments are pressed against one another on lateral faces to obtain tightness, then sealing performance is improved, but segments easily jam one another

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidjamming resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The closure mechanism divides the closure into multiple independent segments that can move separately. Each segment is guided independently by its own linear guide, allowing them to move outward without pressing against each other's lateral faces, thus preventing jamming while maintaining sealing capability through the guided motion and tip arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Linear guides are introduced as intermediary elements between the segments and the drive mechanism. These guides constrain the motion of each segment to a specific path, ensuring that segments move outward smoothly without lateral contact that would cause jamming, while still allowing the tips to maintain contact for sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If rolling guides are used instead of friction guides, then motion smoothness is improved, but sensitivity to contamination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion smoothnessVSAvoidcontamination sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs simple friction-based linear guides rather than complex rolling guides. While friction guides are less smooth, they are much more resistant to contamination and do not require precise maintenance. The simplicity of the linear guide design makes it robust for environments where contamination is a concern, trading some motion smoothness for contamination resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If multiple linear guides are used for each segment, then motion control is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion controlVSAvoidnumber of linear guides
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each linear guide serves multiple functions: it guides the segment's outward motion, provides structural support, and maintains the segment's orientation. The linear guides are integrated into the overall structure, reducing the need for additional separate components. This multi-functional design reduces overall complexity despite the presence of multiple guides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If segments are arranged to close completely at the center, then closure tightness is improved, but activation stroke increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure tightnessVSAvoidactivation stroke
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The segments are designed with curved lateral faces that converge toward the center. This curvature allows the segments to close completely at the center with a more compact arrangement, reducing the required activation stroke compared to linear segment arrangements. The curved geometry enables efficient space utilization while maintaining complete closure capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism is highly resistant to contamination, minimizes jamming, and enables rapid activation with minimal activation strokes, providing a stable and efficient closure for various substances, including viscous and doughy materials, with a compact and cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

a second pivoting lever, which by way of a cam mechanism is mechanically coupled in a movable manner to the first base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 2

each segment is a central part of a dedicated four bar linkage and has a first and a second articulation point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFour-bar linkage: Four-Bar Linkage

Data Source

PatentUS12422597B2Closure mechanism
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US12422597B2 patent drawing
  • US12422597B2 patent drawing
  • US12422597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A closure mechanism for an opening defined by a center and an outer edge, includes multiple segments which can all together close the opening. Each segment has a first pivot lever and a second pivot lever and is controlled by the pivoting movements thereof. The segment along with its pivot levers forms a four-bar linkage. All first pivot levers are attached to a first base and all second pivot levers are attached to a second base. The relative movement between the first base and the second base leads to a drive movement for the pivot levers, wherein the second pivot lever is mechanically coupled to the first base via a cam gearing mechanism.