Segmented Compressor Train for Carbon Capture Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carbon dioxide compressor systems for carbon capture and storage are inefficient at varying power levels, leading to a significant parasitic load on power stations when operating at low power, as they are optimized for full power conditions and struggle to manage reduced carbon dioxide flows effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method using a compressor train with discrete upstream, mid-stream, and downstream portions, where each portion can be operated independently, with the downstream portion's third compression step controlled based on the flow rate of gas entering the upstream portion, allowing for selective bypassing or adjustment of compressor geometry and number of operational compressors to optimize compression at varying flow rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a compressor train is optimized for full power conditions, then compression efficiency is improved at high flow rates, but parasitic load becomes excessive at low power operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidparasitic load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The compressor train is divided into multiple discrete compressor portions (first, second, third portions) that can be operated independently. This segmentation allows selective operation of compressor stages based on flow rate requirements, enabling efficient operation at both high and low power conditions without excessive parasitic load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of operational compressor portions based on the flow rate of carbon dioxide. At high flow rates, all compressor portions operate to maximize compression efficiency. At low flow rates, fewer compressor portions are activated to reduce parasitic load, with the configuration changing in response to varying operational conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single compressor train operates at reduced flow rates, then adaptability to low power conditions is improved, but compression efficiency deteriorates significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcompression efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the compressor train into multiple independent portions, the system can selectively activate the appropriate number of compressor stages based on flow rate requirements. This maintains compression efficiency across varying operational conditions by ensuring that operational compressors work at optimal load levels rather than forcing a single compressor to operate inefficiently at reduced capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by adjusting the number of active compressor portions based on flow rate. This parameter change allows the system to adapt to varying power conditions while maintaining efficient compression, as each operational compressor portion can be optimized for its specific operating range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If recirculation is used to maintain compressor operation at low power, then continuous operation is maintained, but power consumption remains excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts or removes the need for recirculation by using multiple discrete compressor portions that can be selectively operated. Instead of recirculating gas to maintain minimum flow through a single compressor train, the system simply deactivates unnecessary compressor portions, thereby eliminating the parasitic load associated with recirculation while maintaining continuous operation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If multiple discrete compressor sections are used with intercooling, then compression efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidcompressor configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compressor train is segmented into multiple discrete portions that function as separate compression stages. This segmentation provides the benefits of multi-stage compression with improved efficiency while allowing flexible operation. The portions can be operated independently, and intercooling can be applied between stages when needed, balancing complexity with performance benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the power required to drive the compressor train during low power operations, minimizing the parasitic load and maintaining efficiency across varying carbon dioxide production levels, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of the power generation and carbon sequestration process.

Implementation Method 1

compressing it into a dense liquid state (typically at a pressure ratio of up to 200)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS9022747B2Gas compression
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US9022747B2 patent drawing
  • US9022747B2 patent drawing
  • US9022747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of compressing a gas, which uses a compressor train having a plurality of discrete portions and including at least an upstream portion, a mid-stream portion and a downstream portion arranged successively in flow series. The method includes: (i) performing a first compression step by directing a flow of said gas into the upstream compressor portion and driving the upstream compressor portion to compress the gas; (ii) performing a second compression step by directing the compressed flow from the upstream compressor portion into the mid-stream compressor portion and driving the mid-stream compressor portion to further compress the gas; and (iii) performing a third compression step by directing the compressed flow from the mid-stream compressor portion into the downstream compressor portion and driving the downstream compressor portion to further compress the gas.