Segmented Control Arrangement for Fault-Tolerant Execution Unit Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for controlling execution units, such as CAN and LIN bus architectures, face challenges in providing automatic addressing, high fault tolerance, and electromagnetic compatibility, especially in large-scale applications and automotive environments.

Innovation Solution

A system arrangement with segmented execution units in serial sub-chains, where each sub-chain is communicatively coupled with a line driver unit, and the line driver units are connected in series to a command unit, allowing for automatic addressability and enhanced fault tolerance through differential signal modulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CAN bus architecture is used for controlling execution units, then communication reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the network into multiple independent sub-chains, each managed by a line driver unit. This segmentation allows simpler communication protocols within each sub-chain while maintaining overall system reliability through distributed architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Line driver units act as intermediary devices between the master control unit and execution units. These intermediaries simplify the communication protocol by handling low-level signal modulation and addressing, allowing the master unit to use a simpler high-level protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If execution units are connected in series with daisy chaining, then automatic addressing is enabled, but fault tolerance deteriorates as failures can cut off communication to subsequent units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic addressingVSAvoidfault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The series connection is divided into multiple sub-chains, each with its own line driver unit. This segmentation ensures that a failure in one sub-chain does not affect communication in other sub-chains, maintaining fault tolerance while preserving automatic addressing within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates redundant communication paths through the segmented architecture. If one path fails, alternative paths through other line driver units can maintain communication, providing beforehand cushioning against potential failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If more execution units are deployed to increase system capability, then productivity is improved, but susceptibility to electromagnetic interference and common-mode errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoidelectromagnetic susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into multiple sub-chains with dedicated line driver units, the patent reduces the number of units on each communication bus. This segmentation decreases the overall electromagnetic susceptibility of the system while maintaining high productivity through scalable deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each line driver unit and sub-chain can be optimized with local shielding and grounding strategies appropriate to its specific electromagnetic environment. This local quality approach allows tailored protection against electromagnetic interference for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If generic control protocols are used for execution units, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision and error susceptibility increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol compatibilityVSAvoiderror susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Line driver units serve as intermediaries that implement precise low-level communication protocols and signal modulation. This allows generic high-level control protocols to be used for adaptability, while the intermediary line driver units ensure manufacturing precision and low error susceptibility in the physical layer communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed system achieves high fault tolerance and automatic addressability, reducing complexity and susceptibility to errors, while allowing for scalable implementation in various applications, including automotive systems.

Implementation Method 1

the system arrangement is configured to modulate signals on the second data line with an amplitude 10 times greater than signals on the first data line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentEP4040921B1Segmented control arrangement
Publication Date: 2025.04.02 INOVA SEMICON
  • EP4040921B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4040921B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4040921B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system arrangement for the fault-tolerant control of a plurality of execution units. Advantageously, the present invention allows execution units to be controlled in such a way that both high common-mode robustness and high reliability are achieved, even with a large number of execution units. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method for operating and/or manufacturing the proposed system arrangement. In addition, a computer program product with control commands is proposed that executes the method and/or operates the device.