Segmented 3D Printed Counterform for Uniform Sintering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sintering techniques face challenges in achieving uniform densification and easy removal of complex-shaped parts due to heterogeneity and difficulties in removing parts with undercuts and tapers from molds, leading to material loss and geometric defects.

Innovation Solution

A counterform produced using digitally controlled 3D additive printing is used, with increased size to compensate for material shrinkage during sintering, allowing for homogeneous densification and easy separation of complex shapes by dividing the counterform into portions along a joint plane, facilitating the removal of parts with undercuts and tapers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If uniaxial pressure sintering is used to manufacture parts of complex shape, then densification is achieved rapidly, but heterogeneity of densification occurs in regions of different thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering speedVSAvoiddensification uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The counterform is divided into multiple portions that can be assembled together, allowing each portion to be optimized for uniform densification while maintaining the capability to produce complex-shaped parts with varying thicknesses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from traditional mold design to a modular counterform system where portions can be assembled in different configurations, adding a dimensional aspect of modularity to solve the densification uniformity problem

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional molds are used for complex shapes with undercuts and tapers, then parts can be formed, but removal of parts from the mold is difficult and causes material loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart formation capabilityVSAvoidmaterial loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The counterform is segmented into removable portions that can be separated from the sintered part, enabling easy removal of complex-shaped parts with undercuts and tapers without damaging the part or losing material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of designing molds that retain parts, the invention uses a counterform system where portions are deliberately designed to be removed after sintering, inverting the traditional approach to part removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If multiple counterforms are used to avoid removal problems, then part removal is facilitated, but device complexity and manufacturing steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart removal easeVSAvoidnumber of counterforms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The counterform is divided into a manageable number of portions that can be assembled and removed systematically, reducing the complexity compared to using multiple complete counterforms while still facilitating easy part removal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple counterform portions are combined into a single integrated system that functions as one removable assembly, reducing the number of separate tools needed while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures higher homogeneity of porosity and geometric precision in the manufactured parts, reducing material loss and defects, and simplifies the design and assembly process by eliminating the need for multiple molds and specialized tools.

Implementation Method 1

the counterform is formed of successive layers deposited by means of digitally controlled three-dimensional (3D) additive printing

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D additive printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

consolidating a volume of ceramic, polymer or metal powders in a conductive mold in order to rapidly obtain finely microstructured dense materials. This consolidation is achieved by means of the simultaneous application of a load (under a high uniaxial pressure exerted on the mold, for example of the order of 100 MPa) and heating, of the order of 500° C. to 2000° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 3

high-pressure spark sintering known as SPS (spark plasma sintering)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark plasma sintering: Spark Plasma Sintering

Implementation Method 4

the size of the counterform being increased by a density stretch factor that compensates for a shrinkage in the size of the part to be manufactured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal contraction: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentUS12042953B2Method for producing a counter-form and method for manufacturing a part having a complex shape using such a counter-form
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 NORIMAT
  • US12042953B2 patent drawing
  • US12042953B2 patent drawing
  • US12042953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for producing a counter-form (20) for manufacturing a part having a complex shape (24) by pressure sintering densification. The counter-form (20) is formed from successive layers produced by numerically-controlled three-dimensional (3D) additive printing according to the following steps: numerically recording a three-dimensional negative of the part to be produced (24) in a control unit of a three-dimensional additive printing system in order to constitute the positive form of the counter-form to be produced; producing the counter-form (20) using a 3D additive printing technique. The part having a complex shape (24d) is then manufactured by pressure sintering, then separated from the counter-form which is also sintered (20).