Segmented Crane Boom Structure for Weight and Strength Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current crane boom structures, formed by bending a single piece of high-strength steel sheet and welding, face challenges in balancing weight and lifting capacity due to excessive stress on welds, requiring high-strength welding and labor-intensive processes, while also compromising on structural stability and resistance against bending and buckling.

Innovation Solution

The boom structure is formed by joining two separate sheet plates with different thicknesses and strengths, where the lower part is bent from 9 points and the upper part from 5 points, distributing forces evenly and reducing the need for rigorous welding, with weld grooves positioned on the sides to mitigate tensile forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a single piece of high strength steel sheet is bent and welded to form the boom, then the structural integrity is maintained, but the weight increases and lifting capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidboom weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The boom is divided into two separate parts: an upper part and a lower part, each formed from separate steel sheets with different thicknesses. This segmentation allows optimization of each part's weight and strength independently, reducing overall boom weight while maintaining structural integrity through controlled welding at minimized locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different thicknesses are applied to different parts of the boom structure. The upper part uses a first thickness while the lower part uses a second thickness, allowing each region to have the specific structural properties needed for its location, optimizing the balance between weight and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the thickness of the boom profile is increased to improve strength, then the resistance against bending and tearing improves, but the weight increases and lifting capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance against bending and tearingVSAvoidboom weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different thicknesses are applied to different parts of the boom structure. The upper part uses a first thickness while the lower part uses a second thickness, allowing each region to have the specific structural properties needed for its location, optimizing the balance between weight and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The boom is divided into two separate parts: an upper part and a lower part, each formed from separate steel sheets with different thicknesses. This segmentation allows optimization of each part's weight and strength independently, reducing overall boom weight while maintaining structural integrity through controlled welding at minimized locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If excessive reduction in the thickness of the boom profile is made to reduce weight, then the lifting capacity improves, but the structural stability and resistance against bending and tearing reduces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboom weightVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Different thicknesses are applied to different parts of the boom structure. The upper part uses a first thickness while the lower part uses a second thickness, allowing each region to have the specific structural properties needed for its location, optimizing the balance between weight and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The boom is divided into two separate parts: an upper part and a lower part, each formed from separate steel sheets with different thicknesses. This segmentation allows optimization of each part's weight and strength independently, reducing overall boom weight while maintaining structural integrity through controlled welding at minimized locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If the number of bends in the boom structure is increased to improve strength, then the resistance against buckling improves, but the manufacturing complexity and labor operations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance against bucklingVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The boom is divided into two separate parts: an upper part and a lower part, each formed from separate steel sheets. By distributing the required bends across two separate components rather than one, the manufacturing process becomes more manageable while achieving the necessary structural strength and buckling resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3971125B1High strength boom structure
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 ERKIN IS MAKINALARI INSAAT SANAYII ITHALAT IHRACAT TICARET PAZARLAMA LTD SIRKETI
  • EP3971125B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3971125B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3971125B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A boom (10) consisting of an upper part (11) which is formed by bending from 5 separate bending points (14) at equal intervals and thus whose strength is increased; a lower part (12) which forms the lower part of said boom (10), is formed by bending from 9 separate bending points (14) at equal intervals.