Segmented Cutting Tool for Thread Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing material-removing machining tools face challenges in achieving high precision and efficiency, particularly in producing small-scale threads, while also dealing with burr removal and contamination issues, and high production costs.

Innovation Solution

A tool with a specific design featuring cutting elements with defined ratios between the cutting tooth burr and root, and cutting jaw ridge and root, along with a shank for connection to a drive, and integrated cooling channels for efficient machining and heat management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a thread milling cutter with dense teeth is used to machine small-scale threads, then the thread precision is improved, but the chip removal becomes difficult and burr formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread precisionVSAvoidchip removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is segmented into multiple discrete cutting teeth with varying tooth heights. The first cutting teeth have a greater height than the second cutting teeth, creating a stepped configuration that segments the cutting action into distinct stages for material removal and finishing, thereby improving chip evacuation while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the cutting edge are given different properties through the varying tooth heights. The first cutting teeth with greater height are optimized for aggressive material removal, while the second cutting teeth with lesser height provide finishing and deburring functions, creating local quality variations that address both precision and productivity requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If a thread milling cutter with comprehensive teeth is used to remove material, then the material removal capability is improved, but the deburring becomes insufficient and burrs remain on the thread

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal capabilityVSAvoiddeburring quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge is divided into two functional segments: first cutting teeth for material removal and second cutting teeth for deburring. This segmentation allows each segment to be optimized for its specific function, ensuring both efficient material removal and clean deburring without compromise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first cutting teeth perform the preliminary action of material removal to create the thread form, while the second cutting teeth subsequently perform the finishing action of deburring. This sequential preliminary action ensures that burrs are removed after the main cutting operation, achieving both productivity and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the cutting tooth has a large ratio between burr and root, then the material removal is aggressive, but the thread cleanliness is compromised and contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal aggressivenessVSAvoidthread contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting edge segments material removal and finishing functions into separate cutting teeth groups. The first cutting teeth with larger burr-to-root ratio aggressively remove material, while the second cutting teeth with smaller burr-to-root ratio clean up burrs, thereby maintaining thread cleanliness and reducing contamination risk while preserving aggressive material removal capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cutting tooth regions have different burr-to-root ratios optimized for their specific functions. The first cutting teeth have larger ratios for aggressive cutting, while the second cutting teeth have smaller ratios for clean finishing, creating local quality variations that eliminate contamination while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If complex processes are used to produce transition radius in the tool, then the machining precision is improved, but the production costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using complex processes to create a continuous transition radius, the invention segments the cutting edge into discrete cutting teeth with varying heights. This segmentation achieves the desired machining precision through the stepped tooth configuration, avoiding the need for expensive and complex radius transition processes while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses simple, easily manufacturable cutting teeth with defined height differences rather than complex, expensive tool geometry. The cutting teeth can be manufactured using conventional processes, reducing production costs while achieving the required machining precision through their arranged configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool enables precise and efficient material removal with reduced burr formation, improved contamination prevention, and cost-effective production, suitable for small-scale thread machining.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one cooling channel (20) has at least one outlet opening (14) for the coolant in the distal area, in particular in the vicinity of the tool head (3).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

The processes are mostly mechanically controlled and driven. In mechanical and manual removal processes, the contact between the tool and the workpiece often generates waste heat due to friction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction (thermal): Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP3228411A1Tool for stock-removing machining a workpiece
Publication Date: 2017.10.11 SAFELOCK
  • EP3228411A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP3228411A1 patent drawingFigure 1c
  • EP3228411A1 patent drawingFigure 1d~1e

AI summary

The invention relates to a tool (1) for material removal from a workpiece. The tool (1) has a proximal and a distal end. The tool according to the invention further comprises a shaft (2) for connecting the tool (1) in the region of the proximal end to a drive and a tool head (3) in the region of the distal end. The tool (1) according to the invention further comprises cutting elements (4, 4.1, ..., 4.5, 5.1, ..., 5.3) on the tool head (3), wherein the cutting elements (4, 4.1, ..., 4.5, 5.1, ..., 5.3) are designed such that they are able to penetrate the workpiece to be machined and remove a layer of material from said workpiece. The cutting elements (4, 4.1, ..., 4.5, 5.1, ..., 5.3) further comprise at least one cutting tooth (4, 4.1, ..., 4.5) with a cutting tooth burr (D6, D6.1, ... D6.5) and a cutting tooth root (D7, D7.1, ... D7.5). They further comprise at least one cutting jaw (5, 5.1, ..., 5.5) with a cutting jaw burr (D8, D8.1, ... D8.5) and a cutting jaw root (D9, D9.1, ..., D9.5). In the tool (1) according to the invention, the ratio between the cutting tooth burr (D6, D6.1, ... D6.5) and the cutting tooth root (D7, D7.1, ... D7.5) is smaller than the ratio between the cutting jaw burr (D8, D8.1, ... D8.5) and the cutting jaw root (D9, D9.1, ..., D9.5). In particular, the ratio is between two and ten times smaller.