Segmented Electron Detector Layout for Low-Current SEM Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional charged particle detectors in SEM tools face challenges with poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at low electron beam currents, leading to image degradation and reduced throughput, especially in semiconductor manufacturing where high accuracy and resolution are crucial.

Innovation Solution

A method of calibrating a charged particle detector by scanning a beam across a calibration sample, receiving electrical signals from sensing elements, and selecting subsets based on the distribution of secondary and backscattered particles to optimize detection, using an array of sensing elements with selective activation and deactivation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional detectors are used to detect electrons from the sample, then the detection system can operate with simple structure, but the signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates at low electron beam currents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoiddetector structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector is divided into multiple sensing elements arranged in an array, where each element independently detects electrons. This segmentation allows selective activation of only those elements receiving returning particles, reducing noise from inactive elements while maintaining detection capability at low beam currents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detector dynamically adjusts which sensing elements are active based on the distribution of returning particles. By selectively activating elements in regions where secondary electrons are detected while deactivating elements in regions dominated by backscattered electrons, the system adapts to optimize signal-to-noise ratio in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If image averaging or extended integration time is used to improve SNR at low beam currents, then the signal-to-noise ratio improves, but the electron dose on the sample increases causing surface charging artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidsurface charging artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates the signal from secondary electrons from the noise of backscattered electrons by using spatial distribution information. By identifying and selecting only those sensing elements that receive secondary electrons (based on their characteristic angular distribution), the system isolates the useful signal without requiring increased electron dose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Area of stationary object

If the entire array of sensing elements is activated to maximize detection area, then the detection coverage is maximized, but the noise level increases reducing signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection areaVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the detector array are treated differently based on their function. The system identifies regions where sensing elements receive primarily secondary electrons and activates only those elements, while deactivating elements in regions receiving primarily backscattered electrons. This local quality differentiation maintains effective detection area while eliminating noisy regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio, enhancing defect detection accuracy and throughput in semiconductor manufacturing by distinguishing between secondary and backscattered electrons.

Implementation Method 1

an array of sensing elements configured to generate electrical signals in response to incident secondary particles or backscattered particles from the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250264423A1Charged particle detector for microscopy
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20250264423A1 patent drawing
  • US20250264423A1 patent drawing
  • US20250264423A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of configuring a detector of a charged particle assessment system, the detector having an array of sensing elements configured to generate electrical signals in response to incident secondary particles or backscattered particles from a sample, the method comprising:selecting a first subset of the set of sensing elements for activation based on data derived from a predicted distribution of secondary particles or backscattered particles; and selecting a second subset of the set of sensing elements for deactivation based on the predicted distribution;wherein the first subset has a different predicted ratio of incident secondary particles to incident backscattered particles than the second subset.