Segmented EPE Grating for Waveguide Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Exit Pupil Expanders for optical waveguide arrangements suffer from interference caused by light rays, leading to non-uniformities in the out-coupled image, and lack the ability to independently tune the phase of diffracted light rays without altering the amplitude response of the gratings.

Innovation Solution

The Exit Pupil Expander grating is divided into multiple segments with misaligned grating bars, allowing for different phase shifts in each segment, controlled according to Lohmann's detour-phase principle, to minimize interference while maintaining the amplitude of light rays unaltered.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a uniform grating is used in the EPE, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but light rays interfere in the grating causing non-uniformities in the out-coupled image

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrating structure simplicityVSAvoidlight ray interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The EPE grating is divided into multiple segments (first segment, second segment, third segment) with different grating bar configurations. Each segment introduces different path length differences for light rays passing through it, thereby reducing interference effects while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different segments of the grating have different local properties - specifically, different grating bar positions and orientations in each segment. This local variation in grating structure allows different phase shifts to be introduced at different locations, reducing interference while keeping the overall system manufacturable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If grating parameters are varied at different locations to reduce wave interference, then luminance uniformity improves, but the ability to independently tune phase without altering amplitude response is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewave interferenceVSAvoidphase tuning independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The grating is segmented into multiple sections where each segment can independently control the phase of diffracted light rays. By dividing the grating into distinct segments with different bar configurations, the system achieves both interference reduction and independent phase tuning capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grating bars in different segments are positioned asymmetrically relative to each other, with each segment having a unique bar configuration. This asymmetry enables independent phase control for each segment while the overall periodic structure maintains amplitude response consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the EPE grating is divided into multiple segments with misaligned grating bars, then interference effects are reduced and phase tuning is enabled, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference effectsVSAvoidgrating structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grating is divided into a limited number of segments (typically 2-3 segments) rather than continuously varying the structure. This segmentation reduces interference effects and enables phase tuning while avoiding excessive complexity by maintaining a discrete, manageable number of segments with periodic structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces interference effects and provides more degrees of freedom for modifying the optical waveguide operation, enhancing luminance uniformity and image quality by controlling phase shifts without altering the amplitude of light rays.

Implementation Method 1

said multiple grating bars of the first segment and said multiple grating bars of the second segment are misaligned to cause light rays propagating along different paths in the EPE grating to undergo different phase shifts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase shift:

Implementation Method 2

Light rays typically interfere in the EPE grating and hence cause non-uniformities into an out-coupled image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterference: Interference

Implementation Method 3

an EPE grating for expanding the exit pupil of an image on the out-coupling grating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS20230350196A1Exit pupil expander
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 DISPELIX OY
  • US20230350196A1 patent drawing
  • US20230350196A1 patent drawing
  • US20230350196A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example aspect of the present invention, there is provided an Exit Pupil Expander, EPE, grating which is divided into at least two segments, wherein the EPE grating comprises multiple grating bars in a first segment and multiple grating bars in a second segment, said multiple grating bars of the first segment being directed about to a same direction as said multiple grating bars of the second segment and misaligned in a direction which is perpendicular to the direction of the grating bars.