Segmented Filter End Cap for Compressed Air Filtration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing filter assemblies for compressed air face challenges in maximizing filtration efficiency while minimizing pressure drop, and they generate significant waste during filter element replacement. Additionally, there is a need for solutions that are environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and easy to use.

Innovation Solution

A filter assembly with an end cap that consists of two releasably connectable parts, utilizing an interlocking mechanism for easy assembly and disassembly. This design allows for the reuse of the second part of the end cap, reducing waste and enabling frequent filter element replacements without replacing the entire assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the entire filter element including end cap is replaced during filter element exchange, then the filtration system is simple to operate, but a lot of waste is generated and environmental impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter element exchange simplicityVSAvoidwaste material generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is divided into a first part attached to the filter element and a second part that remains in the housing. This segmentation allows the filter element to be replaced independently without replacing the entire end cap assembly, thereby reducing waste while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first part of the end cap is discarded with the filter element, while the second part is recovered and reused in the housing. This selective discarding and recovering approach minimizes waste generation while maintaining ease of filter element exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Device complexity

If the end cap is made large to contain all necessary components, then the filter assembly is simple in structure, but the pressure drop increases and filtration efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend cap structure simplicityVSAvoidfiltration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the end cap into two parts, the design eliminates the need for a large single-piece end cap. The first part attaches to the filter element while the second part integrates with the housing, reducing the overall size and improving airflow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The end cap design transitions from a single large three-dimensional component to two separate components that can be positioned optimally in different locations, allowing for improved airflow paths and reduced pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If the end cap is made compact to reduce size, then the pressure drop is minimized, but the interlocking mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend cap sizeVSAvoidinterlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap is segmented into two separate parts with dedicated connection interfaces. The first part includes a connection interface that attaches to the filter element, while the second part includes a connection interface that attaches to the housing, simplifying the overall mechanism while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interlocking mechanism is extracted and simplified into dedicated connection interfaces on each part. This allows for compact design while maintaining ease of assembly and disassembly through standardized connection points rather than complex integrated mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If the filter element size is increased to improve filtration capacity, then the filtration efficiency improves, but the pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The end cap segmentation allows for optimized positioning of the filter element within the housing, enabling larger filter elements to be installed without increasing overall assembly size. This improves filtration capacity while maintaining pressure characteristics through efficient spatial arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The filter element can be positioned in three-dimensional space more efficiently with the segmented end cap design, allowing for larger filtration surfaces without increasing the linear dimensions of the assembly, thereby improving capacity without proportionally increasing pressure drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250058259A1Filter assembly
Publication Date: 2025.02.20 PLURIFILTER D O O
  • US20250058259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250058259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250058259A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter assembly for filtering a fluid is disclosed. The filter assembly comprises a filter element with an end cap, the end cap being configured for guiding the fluid to the filter element and holding the filter in a housing. The end cap comprises a first part and a second part releasably connectable to each other by an interlocking mechanism, the first part is attached to the filter element, and the second part is releasably attachable to the housing and configured for positioning the filter assembly within the housing.