Segmented Identity Fraud Risk Scoring System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Credit card lenders face challenges in detecting and preventing identity fraud in credit applications, as sophisticated fraud perpetrators use synthetic, stolen, or manipulated identity information, leading to costly fraudulent transactions and a need for balancing fraud prevention with efficient service for legitimate clients.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that analyze applicant information by searching consumer identity repositories, generating identity characteristics, assigning applications to risk segments, and using predictive scoring models to determine risk scores and types of identity fraud, thereby identifying fraudulent applications and reducing false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then fraud prevention is provided, but false positives increase and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fraud detection process into multiple distinct components: identity characteristics generation, segment assignment based on search results, and predictive scoring model application. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining operational efficiency through automated processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating identity characteristics and assigning segments before applying the predictive scoring model. This preliminary processing organizes and pre-evaluates applicant information, enabling the final scoring stage to operate more efficiently with pre-processed data, thereby reducing false positives without sacrificing detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive identity verification is performed, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection precisionVSAvoidapplication processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is divided into segments: searching consumer identity repositories, generating identity characteristics, assigning to risk segments, and applying predictive scoring. This segmentation enables parallel processing and optimization of each stage, achieving comprehensive verification without proportionally increasing total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by transforming raw applicant information into multiple identity characteristics and categorizing applications into different risk segments. This parameter transformation enables more precise fraud detection through multi-dimensional analysis while maintaining efficient processing through automated computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple identity characteristics are generated and analyzed, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity fraud detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex analysis into manageable components: searching repositories, generating characteristics, assigning segments, and scoring. This segmentation reduces system complexity by organizing multiple identity characteristics into structured categories that can be processed independently and systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements including identity characteristics as intermediate data structures and risk segments as intermediate categories. These intermediaries simplify the relationship between raw applicant information and final fraud determination, making the overall system more manageable and interpretable despite analyzing multiple characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8484132B1Systems and methods for segmented risk scoring of identity fraud
Publication Date: 2013.07.09 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS FL INC
  • US8484132B1 patent drawing
  • US8484132B1 patent drawing
  • US8484132B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain embodiments of the invention may include systems, methods, and apparatus for determining fraud risk associated with a credit application. According to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for receiving applicant information associated with the application; searching one or more consumer identity repositories for prior usage of the applicant information; generating a plurality of identity characteristics corresponding to the prior usage of the applicant information; assigning the application to one of a plurality of segments based at least in part on the searching; scoring the application with a predictive scoring model to determine a risk score based at least in part on the identity characteristics; determining identity fraud risk types associated with the application; and outputting the risk score and one or more indicators of the determined identity fraud risk types.