Segmented Fuel Rods with Varying Diameters for Spacing Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nuclear reactor fuel bundles face issues with coolant flow impedance and debris entrapment, which can cause damage to fuel rods due to complex spacer designs and uneven fuel enrichment, leading to potential exposure of nuclear material.

Innovation Solution

The fuel bundle design incorporates multi-segment rods with varying diameters and enrichments, along with solid end portions to prevent fretting damage, and spacer grids to maintain optimal rod spacing and coolant flow, allowing for customizable rod assembly with equally spaced arrays to reduce debris entrapment and maintain a consistent hydrogen-to-uranium ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If complex spacer designs are used to maintain rod spacing, then rod spacing stability is improved, but coolant flow impedance increases and debris entrapment occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverod spacing stabilityVSAvoidcoolant flow impedance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel rod is divided into multiple segments (first fuel rod segment, second fuel rod segment, third fuel rod segment) with different diameters. The spacers are positioned at specific locations between these segments. This segmentation allows the rod assembly to maintain spacing stability while reducing overall spacer complexity and improving coolant flow compared to using complex spacers along the entire rod length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the fuel rod have different diameters (larger diameter at ends, smaller diameter in middle section). Spacers are strategically placed only where needed to maintain rod spacing, rather than continuously along the rod. This local differentiation optimizes both spacing stability and coolant flow by eliminating unnecessary spacer structures that would impede flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If complex spacer designs are used to maintain rod spacing, then rod spacing stability is improved, but debris entrapment and fuel rod damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverod spacing stabilityVSAvoiddebris-induced fuel rod damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel rod is segmented into multiple sections with spacers positioned at specific locations between segments. This segmentation creates a simpler overall structure with fewer spacer components, reducing the number of potential debris entrapment locations and minimizing debris-induced vibration and damage to fuel rods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design extracts or removes unnecessary spacer structures from the conventional continuous spacer configuration. By placing spacers only at specific locations rather than continuously, the design eliminates excess structures that would trap debris and cause harmful vibration and fretting damage to fuel rods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform fuel enrichment is used throughout the rod, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but reactor efficiency decreases due to inconsistent hydrogen-to-uranium ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel rod manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidreactor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel rod employs different enrichment levels in different segments: higher enrichment in the first and third segments (at ends) and lower enrichment in the second segment (middle). This local quality differentiation optimizes the hydrogen-to-uranium ratio along the rod length, improving reactor efficiency while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through a segmented construction approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If solid end portions are added to prevent fretting damage, then fuel rod protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel rod protection against fretting damageVSAvoidrod structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The solid end portions are merged with the fuel rod segments themselves rather than being separate protective components. The first and third fuel rod segments have larger diameters that inherently provide solid end portions, combining the structural fuel rod function with the protective function against fretting damage in a single integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The larger-diameter end segments serve multiple functions: they contain fuel for nuclear reactions, provide structural support, and act as protective solid end portions that prevent fretting damage from debris. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate protective components, maintaining reliability while avoiding additional device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9202598B2Fail-free fuel bundle assembly
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 NORDION (CANADA) INC
  • US9202598B2 patent drawing
  • US9202598B2 patent drawing
  • US9202598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fuel bundle for a nuclear reactor core is provided. The fuel bundle may include a plurality of rods comprised of nuclear fuel rods and/or isotope production rods. Each rod includes a plurality of interconnected rod segments, wherein at least two of the rod segments of at least one rod have different outside diameters. The fuel bundle may additionally include a plurality of rod spacer grids securely retained between axially adjacent, interconnected rod segments. The rod spacer grids interconnected between axially adjacent rod segments form an array of substantially equally spaced rods. The fuel bundle may further include an elongate tubular channel in which the arrayed rods are housed.