Segmented Hot-Forming Press Layout for Lower Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hot-forming presses are expensive, require costly maintenance, and experience unpredictable downtime, leading to significant manufacturing inefficiencies and potential scrap costs due to equipment failures.

Innovation Solution

A hot-forming press design featuring movable lower and upper press assemblies with integrated hot-box portions that apply forming pressure vertically, reducing the stress on components and eliminating the need for extensive stroke lengths, thus minimizing maintenance and repair needs, and incorporating a thermal barrier for efficient heating and insulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional hot-forming presses use a single press assembly with long stroke length to accommodate workpiece placement, removal, and forming force application, then the press can perform all necessary operations, but the components undergo significant stress and require expensive maintenance and repair

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece placement and removal capabilityVSAvoidcomponent stress and maintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The press is divided into two separate press assemblies: a first press assembly that handles workpiece placement and removal operations, and a second press assembly that applies forming force. This segmentation allows each assembly to have optimized stroke length for its specific function, reducing overall component stress and maintenance requirements while maintaining full operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional hot-forming presses use a single press assembly with extended stroke length for die replacement operations, then die replacement is possible, but the stroke length increases the complexity and cost of the press

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie replacement capabilityVSAvoidpress stroke length and structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Die replacement operations are assigned to the first press assembly, which is designed with appropriate stroke length for this specific function. The second press assembly has a shorter stroke optimized for applying forming force. This functional segmentation reduces the overall complexity and cost of the press system while maintaining full die replacement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If conventional hot-forming presses use expensive maintenance and have unpredictable downtime, then the equipment can be maintained, but manufacturing cycle time and productivity are adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment maintenance and uptimeVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The press system is segmented into two independent press assemblies, each optimized for specific functions. This reduces the overall stress on individual components, leading to less frequent and less expensive maintenance. The reduced maintenance requirements and increased reliability directly improve manufacturing cycle time and productivity by minimizing unplanned downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If a hot-forming press fails during operation, then expensive rework or scrap of parts is required, but the failure itself indicates insufficient reliability measures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliability and failure preventionVSAvoidpart rework and scrap cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The press is segmented into two independent assemblies with optimized stroke lengths, reducing component stress and wear. This increased reliability prevents operational failures that would otherwise result in expensive part rework or scrap, protecting the value of workpieces being processed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design anticipates potential failures by reducing stress on components through segmentation, thereby cushioning against the harmful effects of failure before they occur. This preventive approach minimizes the risk of part damage during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces maintenance costs, increases operational efficiency, and minimizes downtime by distributing stress evenly across components, allowing for more cost-effective production with reduced risk of part failure and scrap.

Implementation Method 1

The lower hot-box portion and the upper hot-box portion are configured to heat the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The lower hot-box portion and the upper hot-box portion provide a thermal barrier around a workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS11253898B2Hot-forming presses and methods of hot-forming workpieces
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 THE BOEING CO
  • US11253898B2 patent drawing
  • US11253898B2 patent drawing
  • US11253898B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hot-forming press (100) comprises a lower press assembly (102) and an upper press assembly (108). The lower press assembly (102) is movable along a vertical axis and comprises a lower die (106), and a lower hot-box portion (104), configured to receive the lower die (106). The upper press assembly (108) is movable along the vertical axis above the lower press assembly (102) and comprises an upper die (112), and an upper hot-box portion (110). The upper hot-box portion (110) is configured to receive the upper die (112) so that the upper die (112) is positioned opposite the lower die (106). The lower die (106) and the upper die (112) are configured to apply a forming pressure to a workpiece (114) that is received between the lower die (106) and the upper die (112). The lower hot-box portion (104) and the upper hot-box portion (110) are configured to heat the workpiece (114).