Segmented Knot Constraint for Controlled Stent Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical device delivery systems face challenges in selectively deploying expandable devices, such as stents and stent-grafts, with precise control over deployment rates and characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A medical device deployment apparatus featuring a constraint with multiple interlocking strands forming distinct knot rows, each unraveling at different deployment rates, allowing for selective and controlled deployment of medical devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single uniform constraint structure is used for device deployment, then the device structure is simple, but the deployment control precision is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment control precisionVSAvoidconstraint structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint is divided into multiple discrete knot rows (first knot row, second knot row, third knot row) spaced along the constraint structure. Each knot row can be disrupted independently to initiate unraveling at different deployment rates, enabling precise control over the deployment process while maintaining a relatively simple overall constraint architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different knot rows are configured with different unraveling characteristics and deployment rates. The first knot row unravels at a first deployment rate, the second knot row at a second deployment rate, and the third knot row at a third deployment rate. This local differentiation allows precise control at specific locations along the constraint without requiring complete structural complexity throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple knot rows with different deployment rates are implemented, then the deployment adaptability is improved, but the constraint structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment adaptabilityVSAvoidconstraint structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint is segmented into multiple functional knot rows that can be selectively disrupted. Each knot row serves as an independent control element that can be activated separately, providing multiple deployment scenarios and rates without requiring a completely complex multi-component system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same basic knot row structure is reused multiple times along the constraint, with each instance serving the universal function of constraining the device while potentially unraveling at different rates. This multi-functional approach provides deployment adaptability without proportionally increasing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If the constraint unraveling is initiated by disrupting strands, then the deployment control is precise, but the operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment precisionVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Specific strands are extracted as control elements from the overall constraint structure. By targeting and disrupting individual strands associated with specific knot rows, the system achieves precise deployment control through simple mechanical actions rather than complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint structure is designed to automatically unravel in a controlled manner once a strand is disrupted. The unraveling process is self-propagating through the knot row structure, eliminating the need for continuous external control or complex actuation mechanisms while maintaining precise deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12220336B2Constraining mechanisms for selective deployment and associated methods
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 WL GORE & ASSOC INC
  • US12220336B2 patent drawing
  • US12220336B2 patent drawing
  • US12220336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure are directed toward medical device deployment apparatuses, systems, and methods that include a constraint configured to releasably constrain the medical device. The constraint may be unraveled at different rates.