Segmented Load-Bearing Column Structure for High-Tech Factory Construction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-tech factories require precise construction methods to minimize contamination, but traditional steel construction (SC) or steel reinforced concrete (SRC) for load-bearing columns are expensive and time-consuming, leading to high construction costs and prolonged project timelines.

Innovation Solution

A novel load-bearing column structure comprising a reinforced concrete column, a pre-fabricated reinforced concrete column, and a steel column with a reinforcing bar assembly, which reduces steel usage by 30-50% and allows for faster construction by using pre-fabricated components and efficient grouting techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If steel construction (SC) or steel reinforced concrete (SRC) is used for load-bearing columns, then construction time is reduced and structural strength is improved, but construction cost increases due to high steel consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction speedVSAvoidsteel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The load-bearing column is segmented into three distinct parts: a lower reinforced concrete column, a middle pre-fabricated reinforced concrete column, and an upper steel column with partial reinforcing bars. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function, reducing overall steel consumption while maintaining construction efficiency and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using steel construction throughout the entire column, the invention applies steel construction only to the upper third column where it is most needed for structural support. The lower and middle sections use more cost-effective reinforced concrete, creating local quality variations that reduce total steel consumption while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If steel construction (SC) or steel reinforced concrete (SRC) is used for load-bearing columns, then structural strength is improved, but construction cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidsteel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The column is divided into segments with different material compositions, concentrating steel construction only in the upper third column where maximum structural strength is required. The lower and middle sections use reinforced concrete with appropriate reinforcement, achieving adequate strength at lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements local quality by using steel construction with partial reinforcing bar assemblies only in the upper third column, while the lower and middle sections use conventional reinforced concrete. This localized approach maintains structural strength where needed while reducing overall steel consumption and construction cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If pre-fabricated components are used for load-bearing columns, then construction time is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction timeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The column is segmented into three parts, with the middle section being pre-fabricated. This allows the middle column to be manufactured off-site and assembled quickly, reducing construction time. The segmentation keeps pre-fabrication complexity manageable by limiting it to only the middle section rather than the entire column.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The middle column is prepared in advance as a pre-fabricated component, allowing for off-site manufacturing and quality control. This preliminary action enables faster on-site assembly while the complexity of pre-fabrication is confined to a single manageable section rather than the entire column structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10344468B2Structure of load-bearing columns and factory using the same
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 RUNHORN PRETECH ENG CO LTD
  • US10344468B2 patent drawing
  • US10344468B2 patent drawing
  • US10344468B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present application relates to the structure of a load-bearing column and a factory using the same. The load-bearing columns comprise a first column, a second column and a third column. The first column is a reinforced concrete column and is arranged on the underground floor. The second column is a pre-fabricated reinforced concrete column on the ground floor and is fixed to the top of the first column. The third column is fixed to the top of the second column, wherein the third column comprises a steel column and a third reinforcing bar assembly which surrounds the circumference of the steel column and extends from the bottom of the steel column in an axial direction to a predetermined distance.