Lever-Action Firearm With Segmented Magazine For Damage Tolerance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lever-action firearms suffer from structural design shortcomings, including fixed ammunition configuration, vulnerability to damage, slow and cumbersome unloading, exposure to dirt and debris, and incompatibility with pointed ammunition, which affect durability, operability, and safety.

Innovation Solution

A lever-action firearm design featuring a receiver system with a bolt carrier group, magazine arrangement, and trigger assembly that allows for semi-automatic or automatic operation, incorporating an AR-15 platform compatible upper and lower receiver bodies, a fully-enclosed trigger finger window, and a pivotable action-control lever for efficient ammunition handling and compatibility with pointed ammunition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional lever-action firearms use a thin-walled tubular magazine design, then the firearm can be compact and lightweight, but the magazine is easily damaged from contact with objects and renders the firearm inoperable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm weightVSAvoidmagazine durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The magazine is divided into a magazine body and a separate magazine tube that can be independently replaced. The magazine tube is the sacrificial component that protects the more critical magazine body, allowing the firearm to remain operational even when the tube is damaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The magazine tube acts as an intermediary protective element between external objects and the magazine body. It absorbs damage that would otherwise reach and damage the magazine body, serving as a first line of defense.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Volume of stationary object

If conventional lever-action firearms use end-to-end ammunition orientation in the magazine, then the magazine can be compact, but the projectile of one round can ignite the center-fire primer of the next round

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagazine volumeVSAvoidaccidental primer ignition
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of orienting ammunition end-to-end with projectiles pointing forward, the ammunition is oriented with projectiles pointing rearward toward the shooter. This inversion prevents the projectile from contacting the primer of the next round while maintaining compact magazine volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The potential harm of pointed projectiles is converted into a benefit by orienting them rearward. The sharp projectile point, which would otherwise be dangerous in end-to-end orientation, now serves to prevent primer ignition while maintaining aerodynamic efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Device complexity

If conventional lever-action firearms have a fixed ammunition configuration, then the firearm structure can be simplified, but the firearm is dedicated to a given ammunition regardless of availability or task suitability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirearm structureVSAvoidammunition compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The firearm transitions from a static, fixed-configuration design to a dynamic, adjustable configuration. The magazine and ammunition type can be changed based on mission requirements and ammunition availability, making the firearm adaptable without requiring complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The firearm is designed to perform multiple ammunition types and configurations through interchangeable magazine and caliber conversion capabilities, making it a universal platform that can adapt to various tactical situations rather than being dedicated to a single ammunition type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If conventional lever-action firearms require manual chambering and ejecting of each round to unload, then the mechanism can be simple, but the process is slow and cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunloading mechanismVSAvoidunloading speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The firearm allows preliminary loading of multiple ammunition types and configurations into the magazine before engagement. This preliminary action eliminates the need for repeated manual chambering and ejection during unloading, as the magazine can be quickly removed and replaced with an empty one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The unloading process is simplified by extracting the magazine as a complete unit rather than individually manipulating each cartridge. The magazine can be quickly removed from the firearm and replaced, effectively extracting the entire ammunition supply in one action rather than requiring individual cartridge handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250327635A1Lever-action firearm and kit for constructing the same
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 ARES DEFENSE SYST
  • US20250327635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250327635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver system comprises upper and lower receiver bodies, a lower receiver body, a bolt carrier, and an action-control lever. The upper receiver body is a semi-automatic firearm upper receiver body. The lower receiver body includes a stock mounting flange having a stock receptacle that is matingly engageable with a receiver engaging portion of a stock. The bolt carrier is slidably disposed within a bolt carrier receiving bore of the upper receiver body. The action-control lever has a hand loop and a first attachment arm having a proximate end portion thereof attached to the hand loop. The first attachment arm is pivotably attached at a distal end thereof to the lower receiver body for being pivoted between a battery-ready position and a cartridge-ejecting position relative to the lower receiver body. The action-control lever is attached to the bolt carrier through an articulating coupling assembly.