Segmented Mold Pattern Assembly With Hollow Thermoset Infusion
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing additive manufacturing processes using thermoplastic materials face issues such as material shrinkage, warping, and high costs due to the use of materials like carbon fiber, limiting their applicability and increasing production costs.
Innovation Solution
A method involving CNC routing to create individual layer segments from porous materials like MDF, which are then assembled and infused with a catalyzed thermoset material to form parts with a hollow interior, using lower-cost fill materials and equipment.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If carbon fiber is used as fill material in thermoplastic additive manufacturing, then the structural strength and warping resistance are improved, but the production cost increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces expensive carbon fiber with cheaper alternative fill materials such as wood fiber, glass fiber, or metal powder that can be mixed with thermoplastic materials. This substitution maintains adequate structural strength for many applications while significantly reducing material costs, making additive manufacturing economically viable for broader applications.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses composite materials consisting of thermoplastic base materials mixed with various fill materials (carbon fiber, wood fiber, glass fiber, metal powder) to achieve desired mechanical properties. By optimizing the composition and ratio of these composite materials, the patent balances structural strength requirements with cost reduction goals.
2Ease of manufacture
If thermoplastic material is used in additive manufacturing, then the ease of processing and layering is improved, but material shrinkage and warping occur during cooling
Solution Approach 1:
The patent modifies processing parameters including printing temperature, cooling rate, and layer thickness to control thermal shrinkage and warping. By optimizing these parameters, the patent maintains the ease of thermoplastic processing while minimizing dimensional inaccuracies and warping during the cooling phase.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent accounts for thermal expansion and contraction of thermoplastic materials during the printing and cooling process. By pre-compensating for expected shrinkage in the digital model and controlling cooling rates, the patent reduces warping and maintains manufacturing precision while preserving the benefits of thermoplastic ease of processing.
3Strength
If high fill material content is added to base polymer, then the structural properties and cost-effectiveness are improved, but the processability with additive manufacturing systems deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent optimizes the fill material content within specific ranges (e.g., 10-50% by weight) to balance structural properties with processability. By controlling the concentration of fill materials in the composite, the patent maintains adequate structural strength while ensuring the material remains processable through additive manufacturing systems without excessive viscosity or poor flow characteristics.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent develops composite material formulations with optimized compositions of base polymer and fill materials. By selecting appropriate base polymers and fill material combinations, the patent achieves a balance where high fill content provides structural benefits while the composite remains processable through standard additive manufacturing equipment.
4Extent of automation
If 3D printing equipment is used for additive manufacturing, then the automation and precision are improved, but the equipment cost and operational complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent divides the additive manufacturing process into discrete layers that can be deposited using simpler, more cost-effective equipment. By segmenting the build process into layer-by-layer deposition, the patent achieves automation and precision benefits while using less expensive equipment compared to high-end 3D printing systems.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses digital models and computer-controlled fabrication to replicate complex geometries with high precision. By copying the digital design data into physical layers through controlled material deposition, the patent achieves automation and manufacturing precision while using more affordable equipment than traditional high-end 3D printers.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach allows for the production of polymer-based parts with high fill material content at a lower cost, reducing material waste and equipment expenses while maintaining structural integrity and flexibility in design.
Implementation Method 1
The porous material is infused with a catalyzed thermoset material... by using a vacuum pump, by applying pressure, by dipping the part into the thermoset material, or by spraying the part with the thermoset material
Data Source
AI summary
An additive manufacturing method includes removing material from a sheet to create a plurality of individual layer segments formed, placing at least two first layer segments adjacent to each other at the same height to form a first layer having a hollow interior, the at least two first layer segments defining a first portion of an exterior of a part, and placing at least one second layer segment above the at least two first layer segments to form a second layer having a hollow interior, the at least one second layer segment defining a second portion of the exterior of the part. The method includes attaching the first layer to the second layer and removing material from the first layer and from the second layer to form the part having a continuous surface that extends along the first layer and the second layer.


