Segmented Nickel Catalyst Beds for Steam Reforming Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing steam reforming processes face challenges in achieving an optimal balance between pressure drop and resistance to carbon formation, particularly near the inlet portion of tubular steam reformers, and there is a risk of gaps forming between particulate and structured catalysts.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a combination of particulate and structured nickel steam reforming catalysts, where the particulate catalyst is supported by the structured catalyst, with specific nickel content and dimensions, is used within a tubular steam reformer to enhance catalyst performance and reduce carbon formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If particulate catalyst is used near the inlet, then resistance to carbon formation is improved, but pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon formationVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst bed is segmented into two distinct zones: a structured catalyst section near the inlet and a particulate catalyst section near the outlet. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its optimal function - the structured catalyst minimizes pressure drop in the high-velocity inlet region, while the particulate catalyst provides superior carbon formation resistance in the outlet region where carbon deposition is most problematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different catalyst forms are applied to different locations within the reformer tubes based on local conditions. The structured catalyst is placed where pressure drop is most critical (inlet region), while particulate catalyst is placed where carbon formation resistance is most needed (outlet region). This local optimization resolves the contradiction by matching catalyst properties to local operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stress or pressure

If structured catalyst is used near the outlet, then pressure drop is reduced, but carbon formation resistance worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dropVSAvoidcarbon formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst bed is divided into functional segments with structured catalyst positioned in the outlet region specifically to minimize pressure drop, while particulate catalyst is positioned in the inlet region to provide carbon formation resistance where it is most needed. This spatial segmentation resolves the contradiction by assigning each catalyst type to the location where its primary advantage is most valuable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If particulate and structured catalysts are combined, then catalyst performance is optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst performanceVSAvoidcatalyst bed configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges two different catalyst forms (structured and particulate) into a single integrated catalyst bed system. This combination leverages the complementary strengths of each catalyst type - the structured catalyst's low pressure drop characteristics and the particulate catalyst's high carbon formation resistance - to achieve overall optimized catalyst performance that neither catalyst type could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration optimizes catalyst performance by minimizing pressure drop and carbon formation, ensuring reliable operation and increased efficiency in hydrogen production, while maintaining low methane slip.

Implementation Method 1

a mixture of the hydrocarbon feedstock and steam through a catalyst bed comprising a particulate nickel steam reforming catalyst and a structured nickel steam reforming catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

externally heated by means of a suitable heating medium, generally a hot gas mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS12459814B2Steam reforming
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 JOHNSON MATTHEY DAVY TECHNOLOGIES LTD
  • US12459814B2 patent drawing
  • US12459814B2 patent drawing
  • US12459814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process is described for steam reforming a hydrocarbon feedstock, comprising passing a mixture of the hydrocarbon feedstock and steam through a catalyst bed comprising a particulate nickel steam reforming catalyst and a structured nickel steam reforming catalyst disposed within a plurality of externally heated tubes in a tubular steam reformer, wherein each tube has an inlet to which the mixture of hydrocarbon and steam is fed, an outlet from which a reformed gas containing hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, steam and methane is recovered, and the steam reforming catalyst at the outlet of the tubes is the structured steam reforming catalyst, wherein the particulate steam reforming catalyst comprises 5 to 30% by weight nickel, and the structured steam reforming catalyst comprises nickel dispersed over the surface of a porous metal oxide present as a coating on a non-porous metal or ceramic structure.