Segmented NLP Workflow for Real-Time Verified AI Outputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative AI systems lack accuracy and are prone to errors or 'hallucinations' in specialized contexts requiring high precision, leading to potentially harmful consequences.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a segmented workflow with a primary AI model generating a query, followed by verification with a secondary model against pre-approved authorities to ensure accuracy, incorporating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology to ground AI-generated content in verified examples and authorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a primary AI model is used to generate content quickly, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to hallucinations and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent generation speedVSAvoidaccuracy of generated content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content generation process into distinct phases: a primary AI model generates content quickly in one stage, then a secondary verification model checks for hallucinations and errors in a separate stage. This segmentation allows each model to specialize - the primary model focuses on speed and creativity while the secondary model focuses on accuracy and verification, resolving the contradiction between productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If a segmented workflow with verification is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of generated contentVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a secondary verification model as an intermediary component between the primary AI model and the final output. This intermediary specifically checks for hallucinations and verifies factual accuracy without requiring complete redesign of the entire system. The intermediary approach adds necessary verification capability while minimizing overall system complexity by focusing verification efforts on critical error points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive verification is performed on all generated data, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidverification processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process applies local quality by focusing comprehensive checking on specific critical elements such as factual claims, citations, and data points that are most prone to hallucinations, rather than uniformly verifying every word. The system identifies and prioritizes verification of high-risk content areas, achieving high reliability for critical information while minimizing time loss on less critical portions of the generated content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250321764A1Segmented natural language processing system with real-time interface rendering
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 LEXTEXT INC
  • US20250321764A1 patent drawing
  • US20250321764A1 patent drawing
  • US20250321764A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for automatic generative artificial intelligence (genAI) work product generation. Input is received from a user, such as information on a type of work product that the user intends to generate in a particular industry. The user is then prompted to enter information to generate the work product. Based on the interpretation of the user inputs, a genAI work product is produced. Quality checks are applied to the genAI work product to ensure that any generated data is properly verified and free of mistakes.