Segmented Chemical Oxygen Generator for Aircraft Emergency Descent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing oxygen production devices for aircraft emergency situations require complex and costly control mechanisms and compromise mechanical stability due to non-uniform geometries, failing to efficiently meet the increased oxygen demand during descent and reduced demand during holding altitude.

Innovation Solution

A device with a chemical core comprising two reaction bodies of different lengths, activated simultaneously by a single ignition mechanism, allowing for parallel oxygen production to meet peak demand during descent and reducing oxygen production to meet lower demand during holding altitude, with a uniform geometry for enhanced stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a non-uniform geometry is used to adapt oxygen production rate, then oxygen supply is optimized, but mechanical stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen production rateVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The chemical core is divided into two separate reaction bodies with different lengths, allowing independent control of oxygen production rates while maintaining uniform geometry in each segment. This segmentation enables optimized oxygen supply without compromising mechanical stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each reaction body is designed with specific local characteristics (different lengths) to produce oxygen at different rates, matching the local oxygen demand during descent and holding phases. The uniform geometry of each segment ensures mechanical stability while local variations optimize productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional flow controller is provided for closed-loop control, then oxygen supply control is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxygen supply controlVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the aircraft's own operational phases (descent and holding) as natural control signals. The two reaction bodies are designed to automatically provide different oxygen production rates corresponding to these phases, eliminating the need for external flow controllers or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen production rate is varied by changing the physical parameters of the reaction bodies (different lengths) rather than using active control mechanisms. This passive parameter design simplifies the device while maintaining adaptability to different operational phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If reaction front propagates in one direction, then device structure is simple, but oxygen production time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction core structureVSAvoidoxygen production time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The single reaction core is segmented into two reaction bodies that can be simultaneously activated, allowing parallel oxygen production. This reduces the overall oxygen production time while maintaining simple uniform geometry in each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of extending the reaction front in one dimension (longer core), the invention adds a second dimension by introducing a second reaction body, enabling simultaneous reactions and reducing time without increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a robust, cost-effective, and efficient oxygen supply during emergencies by ensuring adequate oxygen production during descent and reducing production to meet lower demands during holding altitude, maintaining mechanical stability without complex control mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

A device for producing oxygen by way of a thermal decomposition of a chemical located in a cartridge housing is known

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

producing oxygen by means of a chemical reaction, in particular by means of an exothermic, chemical reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 3

triggered by a thermal ignition, e.g. by a pull on the oxygen mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal ignition: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9822005B2Device for creating oxygen
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 BE AEROSPACE SYST GMBH
  • US9822005B2 patent drawing
  • US9822005B2 patent drawing
  • US9822005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for producing oxygen by means of a chemical reaction, in particular by means of an exothermic chemical reaction, wherein the device (1) comprises a chemical core (2), in which a substance producing oxygen by way of chemical reaction is present, and the chemical core (2) comprises a first reaction body (3) and a second reaction body (4) which are arranged in a manner such that they can be simultaneously activated, so that a first reaction front (13) propagates in the first reaction body (3) and simultaneously a second reaction front (14) propagates in the second reaction body (4).