Segmented Subpopulation Testing for Promotional Hypothesis Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current promotion optimization methods rely on backward-looking, aggregate historical data, which fails to account for unanticipated events and individual consumer behavior, leading to inefficient promotion strategies and inability to validate hypotheses effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a forward-looking promotion optimization approach that involves administering test promotions to purposefully segmented subpopulations, tracking actual revealed preferences, and iteratively refining promotion strategies based on real-time data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If backward-looking aggregate historical data is used for promotion optimization, then data collection is simple, but measurement precision and reliability of promotion effectiveness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion effectiveness measurementVSAvoiddata collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the population into multiple subpopulations and administers test promotions to each segment separately. This segmentation allows for precise measurement of promotion effectiveness within each group while accounting for unanticipated events that may affect different segments differently. The segmentation principle transforms the simple but imprecise aggregate measurement into multiple precise measurements across segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary test promotions before full-scale promotional campaigns. By conducting test promotions to segmented subpopulations first, the system validates hypotheses and measures effectiveness in advance, reducing the risk of ineffective full-scale promotions. This preliminary action enables more accurate effectiveness measurement before committing significant resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If test promotions are administered to segmented subpopulations with real-time tracking, then promotion effectiveness measurement precision improves, but system complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion strategy validationVSAvoidreal-time data tracking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback loops where test promotion results from segmented subpopulations are tracked in real-time and used to refine promotion strategies. The system monitors redemption rates, consumer responses, and unanticipated events, then feeds this information back to adjust test promotion variables. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable validation of promotion strategies while managing system complexity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of test promotion variables based on real-time results from segmented subpopulations. The system continuously modifies promotion parameters such as discount levels, target segments, and messaging based on observed effectiveness, enabling reliable strategy validation through adaptive learning rather than static pre-planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If comprehensive real-time data analysis is implemented, then loss of information from unanticipated events is reduced, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunanticipated event impactVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data collection and analysis by subpopulation groups, allowing parallel processing of multiple segments simultaneously. This segmentation reduces the computational burden on any single processing system while capturing comprehensive information about unanticipated events affecting different segments. The divided approach maintains information completeness while reducing processing time through concurrent operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements monitoring of key variables and events that are most likely to impact promotion effectiveness, rather than attempting to analyze every possible data point. By focusing on the most significant factors (partial action), the system reduces processing time and computational resources while still capturing the essential information needed to account for unanticipated events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9940640B2Automated event correlation to improve promotional testing
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US9940640B2 patent drawing
  • US9940640B2 patent drawing
  • US9940640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for implementing forward looking optimizing promotions by administering, in large numbers and iteratively, test promotions formulated using highly granular test variables on purposefully segmented subpopulations. The plurality of test promotions automatically account for covariates. The responses from individuals in the subpopulations are received and analyzed. The analysis result is employed to subsequently formulate general public promotion.