Segmented Promotion Testing for Consumer Behavior Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current promotion optimization methods rely on backward-looking, aggregate historical data, which fails to account for unanticipated events and individual consumer behavior, leading to inefficient promotion strategies and potential long-term damage to brand equity.

Innovation Solution

Implement a forward-looking approach by administering test promotions on purposefully segmented subpopulations to gather actual revealed preferences, allowing for iterative testing and validation of promotion variables to optimize general public promotions effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If backward-looking aggregate historical data is used for promotion optimization, then data collection is simple, but measurement precision and reliability of promotion effectiveness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion effectiveness measurementVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the general population into multiple subpopulations and administers different test promotions to each segment. This segmentation allows for more precise measurement of promotion effectiveness by isolating variables and reducing noise from unanticipated events, directly addressing the measurement precision problem while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured experimentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary testing with subpopulations before launching general promotions. This preliminary action allows validation of promotion variables and prediction of consumer behavior in advance, improving measurement precision by gathering actual revealed preferences rather than relying on imperfect historical aggregate data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If test promotions are administered on purposefully segmented subpopulations, then prediction accuracy of consumer behavior improves, but device complexity and testing effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer behavior predictionVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the population into purposefully segmented subpopulations to test different promotion variables. This segmentation improves reliability of consumer behavior prediction by controlling for external factors and isolating promotion effects, while the structured approach to segmentation prevents system complexity from becoming unmanageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies promotion variables (discount depth, duration, type) across different subpopulations to observe effects on consumer behavior. This parameter changes approach improves prediction reliability by gathering comprehensive data on variable impacts, while the methodical variation keeps the testing system organized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If iterative testing and validation of promotion variables is implemented, then promotion optimization effectiveness improves, but loss of time and productivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion optimization effectivenessVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent conducts preliminary iterative testing with subpopulations to validate promotion variables before full-scale implementation. This preliminary action improves promotion optimization effectiveness by identifying effective variables in advance, while limiting the iterative process to test phases rather than continuous cycles reduces time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where test promotion results from subpopulations inform subsequent testing and final promotion design. This feedback mechanism improves optimization effectiveness by continuously refining promotion variables based on actual consumer responses, while structured feedback cycles prevent indefinite iteration and associated time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10140629B2Automated behavioral economics patterns in promotion testing and methods therefor
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US10140629B2 patent drawing
  • US10140629B2 patent drawing
  • US10140629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for implementing forward looking optimizing promotions by administering, in large numbers and iteratively, test promotions formulated using highly granular test variables on purposefully segmented subpopulations. The plurality of test promotions are associated with at least one behavioral economics principles. The responses from individuals in the subpopulations are received and analyzed. The analysis result is employed to subsequently formulate a general public promotion.