Segmented Rail Guide Plate Design for Injection Molding Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guide plates for rail fastening systems are cumbersome and require long production times due to their massive design, which is necessary for absorbing high forces and providing sufficient surface area, leading to mixing and cooling problems and complex process control in injection molding.

Innovation Solution

A guide plate composed of at least two spatially separate parts that are firmly connected, allowing for adaptation of mechanical properties to specific loads and enabling simpler, cost-effective production by reducing material volume and cycle times, with parts made of different materials for optimal performance and weight reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If guide plates are designed with massive structure to absorb high forces and provide sufficient surface area, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but production time increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide plate is divided into multiple separate components (guide plate proper, reinforcement elements, mounting elements) that can be manufactured independently and assembled together. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function and manufactured more quickly than a single massive structure, while the assembled combination provides the required load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction combining different materials with complementary properties - the guide plate body uses material optimized for guidance function, while reinforcement elements use materials optimized for strength and load-bearing. This composite approach achieves high load-bearing capacity without requiring the entire structure to be massive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If guide plates are designed with massive structure to absorb high forces, then reliability is improved, but material consumption increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce absorption capabilityVSAvoidmaterial volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the guide plate into functional components, material is concentrated only where structurally necessary - reinforcement elements are placed specifically at high-stress areas, mounting elements are positioned at load transfer points. This eliminates unnecessary material in low-stress regions while maintaining reliability through strategic material placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the guide plate assembly have different material properties and thicknesses optimized for local requirements - thicker reinforcement at load-bearing points, thinner material in guidance regions. This local optimization reduces overall material consumption while maintaining force absorption capability where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Stability of the object's composition

If guide plates are made as single massive component, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing complexity and process control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Dividing the guide plate into separate manufacturable components simplifies each individual manufacturing process, avoiding the complexity of molding or fabricating a single massive component. The segmented parts are then joined using standardized connection methods that ensure structural integrity without requiring complex integrated manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Components are pre-manufactured and pre-assembled into sub- assemblies before final assembly. This preliminary action allows each component to be optimized and quality-checked independently, reducing the complexity of final assembly while ensuring structural integrity through controlled joining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2804982B1Plate for guiding and fastening a rail
Publication Date: 2020.09.16 VOSSLOH FASTENING SYST GMBH
  • EP2804982B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2804982B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2804982B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a plate element (1-5; 100) for fastening a rail (S) at a rail fastening point, wherein the plate element (1-5; 100) comprises at least two parts (la, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a; 1b, 2b, 3b, 4b, 5b; 101, 102) that are produced spatially separated from one another, said parts being rigidly connected to one another.