Segmented Reinforcement Panel with Finger Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Structural members such as beams and columns often experience gradual deterioration or sudden loss of strength due to factors like impacts or changes in load, requiring effective and lightweight reinforcement that is corrosion-resistant and easy to install.

Innovation Solution

A structural reinforcement system comprising individual reinforcing elements with end and intermediate segments, supported by an open mesh material, secured with adhesive, and connected via finger joints to form a continuous reinforcement panel that can be easily applied to structural members.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional structural reinforcement methods are used, then strength and durability are improved, but weight increases and installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidreinforcement weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials consisting of multiple reinforcing elements (such as fibers or rods) embedded within a matrix material. This composite structure provides high strength-to-weight ratio, delivering the required structural strength while minimizing the weight of the reinforcement itself, thus resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and weight increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement is divided into multiple discrete elements (fibers, rods, or strands) rather than using a single solid piece. This segmentation allows the load to be distributed across numerous small components, maintaining overall strength while reducing total weight and improving ease of installation compared to heavy monolithic reinforcements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If traditional structural reinforcement methods are used, then strength and durability are improved, but installation ease deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the reinforcement into multiple small, discrete elements that can be easily handled and applied, the system maintains high structural strength while significantly improving installation ease. These segmented elements can be applied in smaller quantities and with simpler procedures compared to traditional large-scale reinforcement methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement system utilizes flexible matrix materials that can be applied as thin films or coatings over the structural member. This flexibility enables easy conforming to complex geometries and simplifies the installation process while maintaining the required strength through the distributed reinforcing elements within the matrix.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Strength

If conventional reinforcement materials are used, then strength is improved, but corrosion resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The use of composite materials with a protective matrix surrounding the reinforcing elements provides both strength and corrosion resistance. The matrix material acts as a barrier protecting the reinforcing elements from corrosive environments, while the composite structure itself provides the required structural strength, thus simultaneously addressing both strength improvement and corrosion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing elements are designed as replaceable, durable components embedded in a protective matrix. While individual elements may be subject to wear, the composite structure allows for localized replacement or repair of damaged sections without compromising the entire reinforcement system, effectively providing long-term corrosion resistance and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a strong, lightweight, and corrosion-resistant reinforcement that can be easily installed, maintaining structural integrity and load-carrying capacity, with the finger joints ensuring consistent force distribution and alignment.

Implementation Method 1

The reinforcing elements are secured to the support by an adhesive. That adhesive may be selected from a group consisting of epoxy, polyester, vinylester, polyurethane, phenolics and mixtures thereof.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10655328B2Structural reinforcement, reinforced structural member and related method
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • US10655328B2 patent drawing
  • US10655328B2 patent drawing
  • US10655328B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural reinforcement includes a plurality of individual reinforcing elements. Each of the plurality of reinforcing elements includes a first end segment, a second end segment and an intermediate segment between the first and second end segments. A support engages the plurality of individual reinforcing elements along the intermediate segments and holds the elements in parallel.