Segmented Robotic Arms for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current minimally invasive surgical technologies, such as laparoscopy and robotic systems like the da Vinci Surgical System, face limitations due to mobility restrictions and limited sensory and visual feedback, making them inadequate for complex surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A robotic surgical system comprising a robotic device that can be positioned completely within a patient's body cavity, featuring movable segmented arms with motors, a support structure for partial external control, and various operational components like grasping, cauterizing, or imaging, allowing for enhanced mobility and sensory feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If robotic systems like da Vinci Surgical System are used, then surgical precision and control are improved, but device size and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is divided into multiple independent robotic arms, each capable of performing surgical tasks autonomously. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high surgical precision through specialized end effectors while reducing the overall device complexity by distributing functions across separate modular units rather than requiring a single large integrated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arms are designed with universal end effectors that can perform multiple surgical functions including grasping, cutting, and suturing. This multi-functionality reduces the need for numerous specialized tools and large device configurations, thereby improving surgical precision while controlling device size and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If rigid tools are inserted through access ports, then visual feedback is limited, but mobility restrictions are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual feedbackVSAvoidmobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arms utilize flexible articulated structures with multiple degrees of freedom, allowing them to navigate through small access ports while maintaining mobility within the body cavity. This flexible design eliminates the need for rigid tools, improving both visual feedback capabilities and operational mobility simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system employs dynamic, reconfigurable arms that can change their configuration and degree of freedom based on surgical requirements. This dynamic capability allows the system to pass through restricted access ports and then expand its mobility range within the body cavity, resolving the contradiction between limited access and operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If minimally invasive procedures are performed, then patient recovery is improved, but surgical capability is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient recoveryVSAvoidsurgical capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arms are designed with nested, telescopic structures that allow compact insertion through small access ports for minimally invasive procedures. Once positioned, the arms can extend and deploy specialized end effectors to perform complex surgical tasks, thereby maintaining patient recovery benefits while expanding surgical capability and versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Ease of operation

If support structure is positioned through orifice, then device accessibility is improved, but procedural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice accessibilityVSAvoidaccess procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is divided into multiple segments that can be inserted and positioned independently through the orifice. This segmentation simplifies the access procedure by allowing step-by-step assembly and positioning, reducing the overall procedural complexity while maintaining improved device accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11617626B2Robotic surgical devices, systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 BOARD OF RGT UNIV OF NEBRASKA
  • US11617626B2 patent drawing
  • US11617626B2 patent drawing
  • US11617626B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The embodiments disclosed herein relate to various medical device components, including components that can be incorporated into robotic and/or in vivo medical devices. Certain embodiments include various modular medical devices for in vivo medical procedures.