Segmented Seal Ring Structure for Gap-Free High-Pressure Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seal apparatuses for oilfield applications face challenges in minimizing extrusion gaps during expansion, leading to potential failure under high differential pressures and difficulties in reliable retraction due to stresses and strains during deployment and use.

Innovation Solution

A segmented seal apparatus with multiple seal elements formed from compliant materials like HNBR and PTFE, arranged in a ring structure with interlocking profiles and biased by axial forces, allowing for smooth expansion and contraction without significant stress, and featuring a design that maintains a solid, gap-free surface in both expanded and collapsed states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If segmented anti-extrusion rings are used during expansion, then the seal element can be deployed, but spaces are formed between segments creating extrusion gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment capabilityVSAvoidextrusion gap prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-extrusion ring is divided into multiple segments that can move relative to each other during expansion, allowing the ring to adapt to the expanding seal element while maintaining continuous contact to prevent extrusion gaps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anti-extrusion ring transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one where segments can slide and rotate during expansion, enabling the ring to maintain its integrity and prevent extrusion gaps throughout the deployment process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multi-layered rings with offset segments are used, then extrusion gaps are blocked, but the ring structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion gap blockingVSAvoidring structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the anti-extrusion function and the gap-blocking function into a single integrated ring structure, eliminating the need for separate multi-layered rings while achieving both objectives through the segmented design with sliding and rotating capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If circumferentially lapped segments are used, then extrusion gaps are avoided, but the ring has uneven faces and is spatially inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrusion gap eliminationVSAvoidring spatial efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The ring segments are designed to dynamically adjust their positions during expansion, sliding and rotating to maintain a compact, space-efficient configuration while eliminating extrusion gaps, rather than relying on static lapped arrangements that waste space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If seal elements are compressed during deployment, then radial expansion into contact with surrounding surface is achieved, but substantial stresses and strains are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal contact achievementVSAvoidseal element stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented seal elements are designed to dynamically expand through sliding and rotating movements rather than pure compression, distributing the deployment stresses and strains across multiple degrees of freedom and reducing the peak loads on each element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces extrusion gaps and minimizes stress on seal elements during deployment, ensuring reliable sealing and easy retraction by maintaining a solid, gap-free surface in both conditions, enhancing the seal's durability and performance under high pressures.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of seal elements is operable to be moved between the expanded and collapsed conditions by sliding with respect to one another along respective contact surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

During deployment, the seal element is compressed to expand radially outwardly into contact with a surrounding surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

the seal element is designed to seal against a pressure differential between respective upper and lower annular regions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3645826B1Seal apparatus and methods of use
Publication Date: 2022.04.20 PEAK WELL SYST PTY LTD
  • EP3645826B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP3645826B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3645826B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5A

AI summary

A seal apparatus and method of use is described. The apparatus comprises a seal assembly comprising a plurality of seal elements assembled together to form a ring structure around a longitudinal axis. The ring structure is operable to be moved between an expanded condition and a collapsed condition by movement of the plurality of seal elements. The plurality of seal elements is operable to be moved between the expanded and collapsed conditions by sliding with respect to one another along respective contact surfaces. Each of the plurality of seal elements is each formed from a compliant, compressible or resilient material.