Segmented Wind Turbine Spar Beam Assembly Without Mandrel Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manufacturing of male spar beams for segmented wind turbine blades is challenging due to the difficulty in removing rigid mandrels, potential defects from misaligned fibre material, and the complexity of accessing interior surfaces, leading to increased costs and defects.

Innovation Solution

The male spar beam is designed with separately manufactured leading-edge and trailing-edge parts, which are moulded in open moulds without a mandrel, allowing for easier inspection and assembly, reducing defects and complexity, and incorporating joints at the centre of spar caps to minimize shear stresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid mandrel is used in the mould, then dimensional stability is improved, but removal difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional stabilityVSAvoidremoval difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel is designed with collapsible walls that can change their structural state from rigid during moulding to collapsed during removal. The walls include inwardly directed flanges that, when collapsed, create clearance between the mandrel and the hollow interior space, enabling easy removal without damaging the spar beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If fibre material is precisely arranged around the mandrel, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the risk of defects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefibre material alignmentVSAvoiddefect risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fibre material is arranged in a pre-form before being placed in the mould. This preliminary shaping allows precise positioning to be achieved more easily and reduces the risk of unintended movement during the moulding process, thereby lowering defect risk while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If a flow media layer is added between fibre material and mandrel, then wetting quality is improved, but post-moulding complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewetting qualityVSAvoidpost-moulding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow media layer is designed as a temporary component that is discarded after serving its purpose during infusion. After the mandrel is removed, the flow media layer is easily detached and discarded, eliminating the need for complex recovery or reuse processes while ensuring sufficient wetting during manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Strength

If the male spar beam is manufactured as a single piece, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The male spar beam is divided into multiple separate components: a mandrel with collapsible walls and reinforcement elements. These segments are manufactured separately and then assembled in the mould, allowing each component to be optimized for its specific function while reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Quantity of substance

If the mandrel walls are made thin, then material usage is reduced, but structural stability during moulding decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The mandrel walls are designed with a dynamic structure including inwardly directed flanges that can transition from an extended stable configuration during moulding to a collapsed configuration during removal. This dynamic design allows thin-walled construction that uses less material while maintaining structural stability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4217603B1Male spar beam for a segmented wind turbine blade
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 BLADE DYNAMICS LTD
  • EP4217603B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4217603B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4217603B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

A male spar beam for mutually attaching a segmented wind turbine blade and, comprising: a leading- edge part comprising a second upper wall, a second lower wall, and a second shear wall connecting the second upper wall with the second lower wall, the leading-edge part; and a trailing-edge part comprising a first upper wall, a first lower wall, and a first shear wall connecting the first upper wall with the first lower wall. The leading-edge and trailing-edge parts being separately formed integrally in one piece, respectively. An end of the first lower wall is attached to an end of the second lower wall so that the first lower wall and the second lower wall form a lower spar cap of the male spar beam, and an end of the first upper wall is attached to an end of the second upper wall so that the first upper wall and the second upper wall form an upper spar cap of the male spar beam.