Segmented Spinal Retraction Device for Minimally Invasive Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Invasive surgical techniques for accessing spinal surgical sites can cause tissue necrosis and creep, necessitating the development of less invasive methods for retraction during spinal surgery.

Innovation Solution

A retractor device with a ring and arm assemblies that can be actuated to move blades from a closed to an open position, featuring a ratcheting mechanism for one-way rotation and removable blades, allowing for dual-stage retraction and minimally invasive access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If invasive surgical techniques are used to access spinal surgical sites, then access to the surgical site is achieved, but tissue necrosis and creep occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to surgical siteVSAvoidtissue necrosis and creep
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor device is divided into multiple independent arm assemblies (first pair and second pair) that can be actuated separately. Each arm assembly can be independently controlled to provide staged retraction, allowing gradual tissue displacement rather than sudden invasive retraction, thereby reducing tissue damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor device employs a dynamic actuation system with actuators that can control the arm assemblies in different stages. The system transitions from a static invasive approach to a dynamic controlled retraction process, where the degree of retraction can be adjusted in real-time to minimize tissue harm while maintaining surgical access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If traditional retractor devices are used, then tissue retraction is achieved, but tissue strain is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue retractionVSAvoidtissue strain
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The retraction force is distributed across multiple arm assemblies rather than applied by a single structure. The first and second pairs of arm assemblies can be actuated independently to distribute and control the mechanical load on tissues, reducing peak strain forces while achieving adequate retraction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device allows control over the degree and timing of retraction through independent actuation of different arm assemblies. By changing the parameters of retraction (timing, degree, distribution), the system achieves effective tissue exposure while minimizing excessive strain on any single tissue region

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9855027B2Retractor device and method
Publication Date: 2018.01.02 ORTHOFIX US LLC
  • US9855027B2 patent drawing
  • US9855027B2 patent drawing
  • US9855027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure generally relates to a retractor device for retracting soft tissue to provide access to a surgical site. The retractor device includes a plurality of arms coupled to a frame and operatively coupled to a ring disposed at least partially within the frame. Related methods of using the retractor device are also described.