Segmented Surgical Retractor with Translation and Rotation Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical devices fail to provide adequate access and tissue clearance during spinal surgery, particularly at deeper levels, limiting the surgeon's ability to perform procedures effectively.

Innovation Solution

A tissue retractor system with a housing and multiple sections, each accommodating blades, featuring a translation mechanism for spreading tissue and a rotation mechanism for further exposure, allowing for controlled retraction and access to the surgical site.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If conventional retraction devices are used, then the surgical site can be accessed, but adequate tissue clearance at deeper levels is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical site exposure areaVSAvoidtissue clearance at deeper levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor is divided into multiple independent blades that can be individually positioned and adjusted. Each blade can be independently manipulated to clear tissue obstructions at different depths and locations, providing comprehensive exposure of the surgical site while maintaining the ability to address deeper level obstructions separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor blades are designed to move in multiple dimensions - they can translate along the longitudinal axis of the housing and also rotate about their own axes. This multi-dimensional movement capability allows the blades to clear tissue obstructions at deeper levels by adjusting both position and orientation, solving the limitation of conventional single-plane retraction devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If the surgical area is enlarged to allow ample access, then surgeon access is improved, but disruption to spinal muscles and sensitive elements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical access areaVSAvoiddisruption to spinal muscles and sensitive elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor blades are designed with varying characteristics along their length, with different portions having different geometries and properties. This allows localized interaction with specific tissue types - broader contact areas for muscle retraction and more precise, smaller contact areas for protecting sensitive neural elements, thereby achieving adequate surgical access while minimizing disruption to critical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor employs dynamically adjustable blades that can be positioned and oriented according to the specific anatomical requirements encountered during surgery. Rather than requiring a fixed large incision, the blades can be adjusted in real-time to provide optimal access while adapting to the actual tissue configuration, thereby minimizing disruption to spinal muscles and sensitive elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If multiple mechanisms are added to improve blade positioning, then retraction control is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade positioning controlVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor integrates multiple positioning functions into a unified blade assembly. The translation and rotation mechanisms are combined within the same structural framework, allowing both longitudinal positioning and angular orientation to be controlled through coordinated movement of integrated components rather than separate mechanisms, thereby enhancing control while limiting complexity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure serves multiple functions simultaneously - it provides the framework for blade attachment, houses the translation mechanisms, contains the rotation mechanisms, and maintains the overall structural integrity. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function, enhancing blade positioning control while keeping the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9968347B2Retractor
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 ALPHATEC SPINE INC
  • US9968347B2 patent drawing
  • US9968347B2 patent drawing
  • US9968347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retractor device for spearing the body tissue apart is provided. The retractor includes a housing configured to include a plurality of sections, wherein each section is configured to accommodate placement of at least one blade, a blade holding mechanism configured to secure the at least one blade within the housing, a translation mechanism configured to provide translation movement of at least one of the sections, and a rotation mechanism configured to provide rotation movement of at least one blade.