Segmented Trellis Support for Posts and Aesthetics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing trellises are not adaptable for supporting unstable or climbing plants around vertical objects like posts, as they are generally planar and lack structural support, and existing circular supports are lightweight, difficult to install, and not aesthetically pleasing when placed over young plants.

Innovation Solution

A trellis support device comprising first and second subassemblies with elongate support members and ring portions that surround objects, allowing for adjustable installation and engagement with underlying materials to provide structural support for plants, with connectors and mounting legs for secure positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a large sized convention wire support is placed over a young plant, then the plant receives structural support, but the natural aesthetic appeal of the lawn or garden is detracted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidaesthetic appeal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The support device is divided into multiple subassemblies (first and second subassemblies) that can be separately installed on opposite sides of the plant. Each subassembly contains multiple support members that can be independently positioned, allowing the structure to be built up gradually as the plant grows, maintaining aesthetics while providing necessary support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support device is designed to be dynamic and adjustable rather than static. The subassemblies can be repositioned, reconfigured, and adjusted as the plant grows, allowing the support structure to adapt to the plant's development stages. This enables the support to be less intrusive initially and more substantial later when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If a one-piece wire construction support is used, then the support provides continuous structural coverage, but the device cannot be disassembled for easy, compact storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous structural coverageVSAvoidcompact storage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support device is segmented into multiple subassemblies that can be disconnected and stored separately. Each subassembly contains support members connected by coupling members, allowing the entire structure to be disassembled into compact components for storage while maintaining structural integrity when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support members and subassemblies are designed to nest within each other when disassembled. The telescoping support members can be collapsed and nested inside one another, and subassemblies can be stored in a compact, space-efficient manner similar to nested dolls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Device complexity

If a one-piece construction support is used, then the structure is simple, but it cannot accommodate posts with large headpieces, such as a mailbox or bird feeder

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidaccommodation of large headpieces
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support device is segmented into multiple subassemblies that can be positioned on opposite sides of the post, allowing the structure to go around large headpieces like mailboxes or bird feeders. Each subassembly can be independently adjusted to accommodate different post configurations and sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure transitions from a single-dimension linear support to a multi-dimensional configuration that can wrap around or go beside objects. The subassemblies can be positioned at different locations and angles, creating a three-dimensional support structure that adapts to various post configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If a planar trellis is used, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but it is not readily adaptable for supporting climbing plants around vertical posts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to vertical posts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The trellis is divided into multiple subassemblies that can be wrapped around vertical posts, transforming the traditional planar structure into a circumferential configuration. Each subassembly can be independently manufactured using simple processes but collectively provides three-dimensional support around the post.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trellis structure transitions from a flat planar form to a curved, circumferential configuration that follows the shape of vertical posts. The subassemblies are designed to curve around the post, providing support in multiple directions rather than a single planar surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS9167755B1Trellis support device
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 KAMPMAN BRIAN
  • US9167755B1 patent drawing
  • US9167755B1 patent drawing
  • US9167755B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A trellis support device includes first and second subassemblies, and each subassembly having one or more elongate support members joining together a plurality of ring portions. The ring portions are configured to align and connect together adjacent first and second subassemblies. The first and second subassemblies are configured to engage an underlying support material and to provide a structurally supported growth area for plants.