Segmented Uplink Message Encryption in Random Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, conventional techniques fail to determine the identity of an access terminal during contention-based random access procedures, especially when encrypted transmissions are involved, leading to challenges in managing uplink messages effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves transmitting a random access preamble and receiving a random access response from a base station, with the access terminal sending a scheduled transmission message that includes an unencrypted portion to facilitate identity recognition and subsequent encryption or decryption based on the security context.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If encryption is applied to the scheduled uplink transmission message in contention-based random access procedure, then security of transmission is improved, but the base station cannot determine the identity of the access terminal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of transmissionVSAvoididentity determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduled transmission message is segmented into two distinct parts: an unencrypted portion containing identity information (such as C-RNTI or other terminal identifiers) and an encrypted portion containing sensitive data. This segmentation allows the base station to first identify the terminal using the unencrypted identity portion, then apply the appropriate security context to decrypt the encrypted portion, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining security and enabling identity determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the message are assigned different security properties - the identity portion remains unencrypted to facilitate recognition, while the sensitive data portion is encrypted for security. This local differentiation of quality (encrypted vs. unencrypted sections) within the same message structure allows simultaneous achievement of both identity determination and transmission security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the entire scheduled transmission message is encrypted, then security is improved, but communication efficiency deteriorates due to inability to recognize terminal identity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcommunication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The message is divided into unencrypted identity information and encrypted sensitive data portions. The unencrypted portion enables rapid terminal identification and security context retrieval, improving communication efficiency, while the encrypted portion maintains security for sensitive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Only the necessary sensitive portions of the message are encrypted, while the identity portion remains unencrypted. This selective encryption approach maintains security where needed while preserving communication efficiency for terminal recognition and setup procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If unencrypted transmission is used for scheduled uplink message, then ease of operation is improved, but security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of terminal recognitionVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The message structure is segmented into an unencrypted portion for easy terminal recognition and an encrypted portion for secure data transmission. This segmentation allows the system to leverage the simplicity of unencrypted transmission for identity purposes while protecting sensitive information through encryption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different security levels are applied to different parts of the message - the identity portion uses unencrypted transmission for ease of recognition, while the sensitive data portion uses encryption for security. This local quality differentiation optimizes both operational ease and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2163064B1Encryption of the scheduled uplink message in random access procedure
Publication Date: 2018.05.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP2163064B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2163064B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2163064B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methodologies are described that facilitate employing a random access procedure that leverages encrypted and/or unencrypted data in a scheduled uplink message. A random access preamble can be sent from an access terminal to a base station, and a random access response can be sent from the base station to the access terminal. A scheduled transmission message can be sent from the access terminal to the base station based upon a grant included in the random access response. When contention based random access is employed, the scheduled transmission message or a portion thereof can be unencrypted. Further, non-security-critical information can be sent in an unencrypted manner in the scheduled transmission message, while security-critical information can be encrypted for transmission (e.g., included in an encrypted portion of the scheduled transmission message and/or transmitted in a subsequent encrypted normal scheduled transmission message).