Segmented Vertical Member for Modular Scaffolding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modular scaffolding systems face challenges in inter-compatibility with frame-type systems, leading to reduced load-carrying capacity and increased labor costs due to the need for specialized expertise and heavier components.

Innovation Solution

A high-capacity vertical member with an extruded tube featuring a large intermediate section and reduced diameter top and bottom sections, incorporating a securing rosette and reinforcing sleeve for improved load distribution and connection compatibility with existing modular systems, allowing for easier assembly and higher load-bearing capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If frame-type systems use smaller diameter tubes to reduce weight, then ease of operation improves, but load-carrying capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of carryingVSAvoidload-carrying capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical member is divided into three distinct sections: a large-diameter intermediate section for high load capacity, and two reduced-diameter end sections for compatibility and reduced weight. This segmentation allows each part to serve its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the vertical member have different diameters tailored to their specific functions: the intermediate section has larger diameter for strength, while the end sections have reduced diameter for compatibility with existing modular components and reduced weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If modular systems use larger diameter support posts to increase load capacity, then strength improves, but weight increases making them harder to carry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-carrying capacityVSAvoidease of carrying
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical member is segmented into a large-diameter intermediate section for strength and reduced-diameter end sections for reduced weight and compatibility, allowing the member to achieve high load capacity without the entire structure being excessively heavy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical member has non-uniform diameter distribution with larger diameter where strength is needed (intermediate section) and smaller diameter where weight reduction is beneficial (end sections), optimizing the strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If frame-type systems use reduced diameter tubes, then weight decreases improving portability, but inter-compatibility with support post systems deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidinter-compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical member has reduced-diameter end sections that match the dimensions of existing modular scaffold components, enabling inter-compatibility, while the intermediate section maintains larger diameter for high load capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical member serves multiple functions: the reduced-diameter end sections provide compatibility with existing modular components (ledgers, cross-braces), while the large-diameter intermediate section provides high load-carrying capacity, making it suitable for both frame-type and support post-type applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Strength

If support post systems use larger diameter tubes, then load-carrying capacity improves, but device complexity increases due to non-standard components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-carrying capacityVSAvoidcomponent standardization
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical member has reduced-diameter end sections that match standard modular scaffold dimensions, allowing use of existing standard components (ledgers, cross-braces, coupling devices) while the intermediate section provides enhanced load capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical member is designed to be compatible with both frame-type and support post-type modular systems, allowing the same component to serve in multiple system configurations without requiring specialized or non-standard parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9719267B2High capacity vertical member for use with modular scaffolding
Publication Date: 2017.08.01 ATLANTIC PACIFIC EQUIPMENT LLC
  • US9719267B2 patent drawing
  • US9719267B2 patent drawing
  • US9719267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vertical member of a modular scaffolding system includes a securing rosette provided in an upper section having a reduced diameter to provide a pre-determined modular connection. The vertical member includes an elongate intermediate section forming the majority of the vertical member of a first diameter greater than the reduced diameter. The intermediate section at a lower edge includes an integral spigot of the reduced diameter. A reinforcing sleeve is fixedly secured to the upper section above the rosette and forms a spigot receiving socket. The vertical member has higher capacity due to the larger diameter intermediate section while maintaining modularity of the scaffolding system.