Segmented Wig Planting Nets for Efficient Natural-Look Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Luxury wigs are traditionally manufactured by hand, requiring significant labor and limiting production efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A braided lace wig manufacturing method that involves dividing a planting net into multiple areas, knotting wig fibers according to a pattern, and connecting a pre-manufactured ornamental hairpiece to a loop pattern, utilizing a computing device for automation and tension control to enhance productivity and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If hand manufacturing methods are used for luxury wigs, then high quality and natural look are achieved, but labor cost increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewig manufacturing productivityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The planting net is divided into multiple areas (front, side, rear) with distinct functions. The front area focuses on natural look through direct knotting, while side and rear areas use loop patterns for efficient fiber placement. This segmentation enables specialized processing for each region, improving overall productivity while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Loop patterns are pre-formed on the planting net before final fiber knotting. This preliminary action creates ready-to-accept structures that simplify subsequent fiber placement operations, reducing manufacturing time and labor requirements while ensuring consistent quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated processes are introduced for wig manufacturing, then productivity increases and costs decrease, but manufacturing precision and natural look may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewig manufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidfiber placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different manufacturing techniques are applied to different regions of the wig. The front area uses manual direct knotting for natural look, while side and rear areas use automated loop pattern formation. This local differentiation allows automation to improve efficiency without compromising the natural appearance where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The loop pattern acts as an intermediary structure between the automated manufacturing process and the final fiber placement. It provides a standardized framework that guides subsequent fiber knotting, ensuring precision and natural look while enabling automated production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If a full cap of standardized style is manufactured manually, then complete coverage is achieved, but labor time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewig coverage areaVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The wig is divided into multiple planting net areas (front, side, rear) that can be processed independently. Each area is optimized for its specific requirements, allowing parallel processing and reducing total manufacturing time while maintaining complete head coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Loop patterns are pre-formed on the planting nets before final assembly. This preliminary structure preparation eliminates time-consuming on-site fiber placement operations, significantly reducing manufacturing time while ensuring complete and uniform wig coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Shape

If manual fiber knotting is performed on the entire cap, then natural appearance is maintained, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural lookVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Manual direct knotting is applied only to the front area where natural appearance is most critical. The side and rear areas use automated loop pattern formation, reducing labor costs while maintaining the natural look in the most visible regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The loop pattern serves as an intermediary that enables cost-effective automated fiber placement while maintaining natural appearance. It provides a structured framework that guides fiber placement to create natural-looking results without requiring expensive manual processing throughout the entire cap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250248470A1Wig and wig manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 HAIRPIA TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US20250248470A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248470A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248470A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a wig including a planting net divided into a plurality of planting nets, the planting net including a front planting net, one pair of side planting nets, and a rear planting net. The front planting net is manufactured as a wig fabric by knotting wig fibers, a loop pattern with a certain shape prepared in advance is provided as a plurality of portions on the one pair of side planting nets and the rear planting net, and an ornamental hairpiece in a certain shape is connected to the loop pattern, and the front planting net, the one pair of side planting nets, and the rear planting net are sewn together so that a user is able to create a more natural look when wearing the wig.