Seismic Dip Decimation for Efficient, Accurate RGT Image Computation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Seismic images have large dimensions and significant data volumes, which can take a long time to process, especially with iterative schemes like [LOMASK2006], and may not be compatible with existing graphical processing units, impacting the accuracy of chrono-stratigraphic analysis.

Innovation Solution

A method involving decimating the seismic dip image by a factor along horizontal dimensions, initializing decimated seismic horizon surfaces, and iteratively modifying them to align with local seismic dips, while maintaining vertical resolution for accurate RGT image computation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If iterative schemes like LOMASK2006 are used to process seismic images, then accuracy of RGT image computation is improved, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of RGT image computationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the seismic image processing into two distinct stages: (1) computing seismic dips at full resolution to capture accurate local gradient information, and (2) processing the decimated image with iterative schemes to reduce computational burden. This segmentation allows the computationally intensive iterative processing to operate on reduced data while still achieving accurate RGT images through the guidance of full-resolution dip information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by computing the seismic dip image at full resolution before decimation. This preliminary computation of local gradient information provides a foundation that guides the subsequent iterative processing on decimated data, ensuring that even though the iterative scheme operates on reduced-resolution data, it benefits from the accurate dip constraints established in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If full-resolution seismic images are processed, then accuracy of chrono-stratigraphic analysis is improved, but data processing volume becomes unmanageable for existing GPUs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of chrono-stratigraphic analysisVSAvoiddata processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the most critical information from the full-resolution seismic image by computing the seismic dip image, which captures the local gradient information necessary for accurate horizon picking. This extracted dip information is then used to guide the iterative processing on decimated data, allowing the system to work with reduced data volumes while maintaining accuracy through the extracted gradient constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing is segmented into full-resolution dip computation followed by decimated iterative processing. This segmentation allows the system to retain full-resolution information where it matters most (in the dip constraints) while using reduced-resolution data for the computationally intensive iterative horizon picking, thereby managing data volume for existing GPUs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If decimation is applied to reduce data volume, then processing efficiency is improved, but resolution and accuracy may be degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidresolution and accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by computing seismic dips at full resolution to preserve local gradient information accuracy, while allowing decimation in regions where full resolution is less critical for the iterative horizon picking process. This ensures that local accuracy is maintained where it matters most (in the dip constraints) while achieving overall processing efficiency through selective decimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4281812B1Method and system for processing seismic images to obtain an RGT image by using a decimated seismic dip image
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 TOTALENERGIES ONETECH
  • EP4281812B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4281812B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4b
  • EP4281812B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~5c

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a computer implemented method (30) for processing a seismic image comprising at least one horizontal dimension and one vertical dimension, said method comprising: - (S30) determining a seismic dip image based on the seismic image; - (S31 ) decimating the seismic dip image by a decimating factor along at least one horizontal dimension in order to obtain a decimated seismic dip image; - (S32) initializing decimated seismic horizon surfaces; - (S33) iteratively modifying the decimated seismic horizon surfaces to progressively increase alignment between local orientations of each decimated seismic horizon surface and the corresponding local seismic dips of the decimated seismic dip image, said local orientations or local seismic dips being corrected by the decimating factor, until a predetermined stop criterion is satisfied; - (S35) determining a relative geological time, RGT, image based on the decimated seismic horizon surfaces.