Seismic Foundation Framer with Modular Rebar Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The construction industry faces challenges with high costs and inefficiencies due to reliance on manual labor, complex and costly formworks, and limitations in creating complex architectural designs, particularly with curved structures, which result in time-consuming processes, material waste, and inconsistent quality.

Innovation Solution

A seismic foundation framer system comprising a ribbon frame with openings for concrete flow and rebar positioning, along with a containment sleeve for improved reinforcement and curing, allowing for efficient construction of complex designs with reduced material waste and increased durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional wooden forms and rebar cages are used for foundation construction, then structural reinforcement is achieved, but construction time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural reinforcementVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The foundation system is segmented into modular units with pre-positioned rebar sections. Each module contains integrated rebar cages that are factory-assembled and transported to site as complete units, eliminating on-site rebar tying while maintaining structural reinforcement requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Rebar cages and foundation forms are prepared in advance as integrated modular units before site delivery. The rebar is pre-positioned and secured within each module during manufacturing, so that upon arrival at the construction site, the modules can be immediately installed without time-consuming on-site rebar assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual labor is used for rebar configuration and form construction, then precise rebar positioning is achieved, but labor costs and construction complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverebar positioning accuracyVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rebar positioning is performed in advance during factory module assembly using automated or precision manual processes under controlled conditions. The rebar is accurately positioned and secured within each module before shipment, transferring the precision requirement from the complex on-site construction phase to the controlled manufacturing phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Standardized rebar cage designs are replicated across multiple foundation modules through factory manufacturing. Each module is a copy of the validated design, ensuring consistent rebar positioning accuracy without requiring skilled workers to repeatedly interpret blueprints and perform complex on-site assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional rectilinear forms are used, then construction simplicity is maintained, but architectural design flexibility is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidarchitectural design flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The foundation system transitions from fixed rectilinear forms to modular units that can be dynamically configured in various arrangements. Modules can be positioned at different orientations and combinations to create curved, angular, or irregular foundation perimeters, enabling diverse architectural designs while maintaining the simplicity of modular assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The foundation is divided into standardized modular units that can be assembled in different configurations. By segmenting the foundation into discrete modules, the system achieves both construction simplicity through standardized components and design flexibility through varied module arrangements and orientations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Shape

If complex curved surfaces are constructed conventionally, then architectural complexity is achieved, but formwork costs and material waste increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurved surface complexityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables curved and complex surface geometries through dynamic arrangement of modular units rather than requiring custom-formwork for each curve. Modules can be positioned at varying angles and orientations to approximate curved surfaces, achieving architectural complexity without the material waste associated with traditional curved formwork construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11286667B2Seismic foundation framer and method of forming a foundation using same
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 ARMATRON SYST LLC
  • US11286667B2 patent drawing
  • US11286667B2 patent drawing
  • US11286667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plurality of seismic foundation frames are utilized to secure rebar in a fixed location to produce a cementitious supporting form that is embedded in the poured concrete and reinforces the concrete. The frame has an open construction with a plurality of openings to allow the concrete to flow therethrough and to provide increased surface area for reinforcement. The frame has pin openings and rebar openings for receiving and retaining pins or rebar respectively, such as when the frames are stacked. A frame has rebar retainers for retaining rebar that extends perpendicularly to the surface of the frame to a second frame at an offset distance. A flexible containment sleeve is configured around the frames and may be fastened to the frame to create a sleeved form for receiving a cementitious mix. The containment sleeve has apertures for controlled permeation to control the rate of cure of the cementitious mix.