Seismic Receiver Geometry Reduces Surface Scattering Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seismic exploration techniques face challenges in reducing noise from surface scattering, which affects the quality and confidence of seismic signal processing, especially in deep subterranean surveys where noise can occupy up to 95% of measurement signal strength.

Innovation Solution

The described geometry for the layout of seismic sources and receivers on the terranean surface reduces noise by optimizing the distribution of receivers, with fewer receivers in certain zones and more in others, spaced uniformly, to minimize surface scattering noise while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If densely-packed arrays of seismic energy receivers are installed within each square area, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic signal qualityVSAvoidreceiver array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The survey area is divided into multiple square areas, each defined by four seismic energy sources at the corners. Receivers are installed within these segmented square areas rather than uniformly across the entire survey area, allowing for localized dense sampling where needed while reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the survey area have different receiver densities. Each square area can have receivers installed based on local geological complexity and noise conditions, allowing high measurement precision in critical zones while using fewer receivers in areas with lower requirements, thus balancing quality and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If conventional parallel row arrangements of sources and receivers are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but noise from surface scattering increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidsurface scattering noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent breaks the conventional symmetric parallel row arrangement by placing receivers within square areas defined by sources at corners, creating an asymmetric geometry that reduces surface scattering noise while still maintaining relatively simple deployment procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of arranging sources and receivers in one-dimensional parallel rows, the patent introduces a two-dimensional square area configuration where receivers are positioned within areas defined by corner sources, adding spatial dimensionality to reduce noise while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If more seismic energy receivers are installed to reduce noise, then measurement precision improves, but loss of energy and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic signal qualityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than uniformly distributing receivers across the entire survey area, the patent applies partial action by concentrating receivers within specific square areas where they are most needed, achieving sufficient measurement precision without the excessive energy cost of full-area dense coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial distribution parameter of receiver placement from uniform to non-uniform, concentrating receivers within square areas defined by source configurations, which optimizes signal quality while reducing the total number of receivers and associated operational costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces noise interference, allowing for clearer seismic signal processing and improved image generation of subterranean formations with reduced aliasing and noise, enhancing the accuracy of seismic data without increasing equipment or operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

seismic reflection is used for exploring geophysics by using principles of seismology to estimate the characteristics of the Earth's subsurface from reflected seismic waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSeismic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9304215B2Receiving seismic signals from seismic signal sources
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • US9304215B2 patent drawing
  • US9304215B2 patent drawing
  • US9304215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seismic exploration system includes a survey area defined by a perimeter and including a first plurality of sub-areas and a second plurality of sub-areas adjacent the first plurality of sub-areas; two or more seismic energy sources installed within the perimeter of the seismic survey area; a first plurality of groups of seismic energy receivers installed in the first plurality of sub-areas, each of the groups of seismic energy receivers in the first plurality of groups including two or more seismic energy receivers per wavelength of seismic energy generated by the two or more seismic energy sources; and a second plurality of groups of seismic energy receivers installed in the second plurality of sub-areas, each of the groups of seismic energy receivers in the second plurality of groups including less than two seismic energy receivers per wavelength of seismic energy generated by the two or more seismic energy sources.