Optimizing Seismic Source-Receiver Pair Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 4D seismic survey techniques are time-consuming, relatively inaccurate, and costly, making them inefficient for detecting changes in subsurface structures over short periods.

Innovation Solution

The method involves optimizing the positioning of source-receiver pairs using demigration techniques, petroelastic models, and surface factor considerations to enhance detection sensitivity and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional 4D seismic survey techniques are used to fully update a 3D acquisition of the subsurface, then complete seismic coverage is achieved, but the acquisition time increases to several weeks or months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic data completenessVSAvoidacquisition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses only on the essential source-receiver pairs needed to monitor specific areas of interest in the subsurface, rather than acquiring complete 3D seismic coverage. This selective approach reduces acquisition time while maintaining sufficient data for detecting changes in petrophysical properties of monitoring targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by acquiring seismic data only from selected source-receiver pairs that are most relevant for monitoring specific subsurface areas, rather than performing full 3D acquisitions. This partial coverage is sufficient for 4D monitoring purposes and significantly reduces acquisition time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If conventional non-permanent seismic systems are used for 4D surveys, then complete subsurface imaging is obtained, but repeatability accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubsurface imaging accuracyVSAvoidrepeatability accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-positioning permanent or semi-permanent sensors in the subsurface before acquisition begins. These pre-installed sensors ensure consistent positioning across multiple surveys, improving repeatability accuracy while maintaining complete subsurface imaging capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The permanent sensor system serves itself by maintaining fixed positions and consistent geometric relationships with seismic sources across multiple surveys. This self-maintaining positioning system eliminates the repeatability issues associated with temporary sensor deployment and recovery between surveys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If a large number of source-receiver pairs are deployed in ultralight active seismic systems, then detection sensitivity improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating seismic monitoring resources in specific areas of interest rather than uniformly distributing sources and receivers across the entire survey area. This focused approach maintains high detection sensitivity for monitoring targets while reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the seismic monitoring system into discrete, independently deployable source-receiver pairs or small groups, rather than requiring a complete dense array. This modular segmentation reduces system complexity while maintaining adequate detection sensitivity for identifying changes in petrophysical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If conventional seismic acquisition methods are used, then comprehensive subsurface data is collected, but processing and analysis time extends over weeks to months

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic data volumeVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the seismic data from selected source-receiver pairs that are relevant to monitoring specific areas of interest, rather than processing complete 3D seismic datasets. This selective data processing significantly reduces computation time while maintaining the ability to detect changes in subsurface petrophysical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for faster, more accurate, and cost-effective detection of subtle changes in seismic properties over short periods, improving the sensitivity of ultralight active seismic systems.

Implementation Method 1

These seismic waves propagate towards the seabed and cross it to penetrate it until they encounter a reflective structure and thus reflect them

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSeismic wave propagation: Sound

Implementation Method 2

These reflected seismic waves propagate towards the sea surface until they are detected by seismic sensors integrated into the streamers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

The term ultralight means that a limited number of source-receiver pairs are implemented compared to a conventional seismic acquisition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSeismic wave detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentEP3548930B1Method for improving seismic acquisitions utilising active ultralight seismic detection systems
Publication Date: 2025.06.04 SPOTLIGHT
  • EP3548930B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3548930B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3548930B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method for determining the optimum positioning of source-receiver pairs capable of acquiring seismic data, comprising: a first step of identifying a zone of interest (32) having been the subject of an earlier seismic acquisition, in order to obtain an image of the subsoil of same; a second step of obtaining seismic data acquired during the earlier seismic acquisition of said zone of interest during a time of interest; a third step of applying a partial or total demigration of seismic data, in order to determine the positions of each source-receiver pair (31, 34) having contributed to the image of said subsoil of said zone of interest during said time of interest; a fourth step of obtaining unprocessed traces for said source-receiver pair positions (31, 34); a fifth step of selecting at least one optimum unprocessed trace from among said unprocessed traces; and a sixth step of determining the source-receiver pair positions (31, 34) corresponding to said at least one optimum unprocessed trace.