Seismic Survey Geometry Optimization for Complex Terrain Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conducting seismic surveys in regions with difficult access, such as dense vegetation and rugged terrain, is costly and poses health and safety risks due to the need for extensive manual deployment of seismic sources and receivers, often resulting in suboptimal subsurface imaging.

Innovation Solution

A method using a computer-based approach to evaluate and optimize the acquisition geometry of seismic surveys by determining optimal locations for base camps, sources, and receivers, leveraging airborne vehicles and unmanned ground vehicles to minimize environmental impact and safety risks, while ensuring high-quality subsurface imaging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a regular grid acquisition geometry is used for seismic survey, then the survey can be systematically deployed, but the subsurface image quality deteriorates in complex 3D geological structures and rugged terrains due to huge openings and insufficient receiver density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment systematizationVSAvoidsubsurface image quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a virtual seismic survey and synthetic data generation before the actual field deployment. The method evaluates multiple acquisition geometries in silico using a priori velocity models and imaging algorithms to predict subsurface image quality, allowing the selection of optimal receiver locations before physical deployment occurs. This prevents suboptimal grid-based deployments that would otherwise result in poor image quality for complex 3D structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by transitioning from a static regular grid geometry to a dynamic, optimized acquisition geometry. The method uses iterative optimization algorithms that adjust receiver locations based on virtual survey results, a priori velocity models, and imaging quality metrics. This dynamic adaptation allows the acquisition geometry to be tailored to complex 3D geological structures and rugged terrains, improving subsurface image quality while maintaining deployment feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the density of receivers is increased to improve subsurface image quality, then the imaging precision improves, but the cost and environmental impact increase due to more extensive manual deployment in difficult-to-access regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubsurface image qualityVSAvoiddeployment complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by conducting virtual seismic surveys and synthetic data generation before field deployment. This allows the identification of optimal receiver locations that achieve high subsurface image quality with minimized receiver density. By evaluating acquisition geometries in silico using a priori velocity models and imaging algorithms, the method determines the minimum necessary receiver density required for high-quality imaging in complex terrains, avoiding unnecessary deployment complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating virtual copies of the seismic survey through synthetic data generation. Instead of immediately deploying physical receivers in difficult-to-access regions, the method first creates a virtual model of the survey using a priori velocity models and generates synthetic seismic data. This virtual copy allows evaluation of different acquisition geometries and receiver densities to identify the optimal configuration that achieves high image quality with minimal deployment complexity, before committing to actual field deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If manual deployment of seismic sources and receivers is performed in regions with difficult access, then the survey can be conducted, but health and safety risks and environmental impact increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey executionVSAvoidhealth and safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing comprehensive virtual seismic surveys and acquisition geometry optimization before field deployment. The method evaluates multiple acquisition geometries, determines optimal base camp locations, and identifies the minimum necessary receiver density and locations using a priori velocity models and imaging algorithms. This preliminary virtual planning reduces the need for extensive manual deployment in difficult-to-access regions, thereby minimizing health and safety risks and environmental impact while still achieving high-quality subsurface imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Length of stationary object

If the depth of the target increases, then the exploration capability improves, but the acquisition geometry requirements become more stringent leading to higher deployment costs and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget depthVSAvoidacquisition geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing virtual seismic surveys and synthetic data generation for deep targets before field deployment. The method uses a priori velocity models to simulate seismic wave propagation to deep targets and evaluates different acquisition geometries using imaging algorithms. This allows determination of the optimal receiver density and distribution required for deep target imaging, avoiding excessive deployment complexity while achieving the necessary penetration depth and image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by adjusting acquisition geometry parameters based on target depth. The method uses iterative optimization that modifies receiver spacing, profile lengths, and survey area extent according to the depth of the target. For deeper targets, the optimization algorithm determines the appropriate increase in receiver density and survey scale, balancing the need for deep penetration with deployment feasibility and cost constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3413092B1Method for evaluating a geophysical survey acquisition geometry over a region of interest, related process, system and computer program product
Publication Date: 2022.06.01 TOTALENERGIES ONETECH
  • EP3413092B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3413092B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3413092B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention concerns a method for evaluating a geophysical survey acquisition geometry over a region of interest. The method comprises: - determining (200) a location of a plurality of base camps in respect of a determined minimal surface density of base camps, - determining (210) a first set of locations of a plurality of receivers in respect of a determined minimal surface density of receivers, - generating (220) a first synthetic geophysical dataset based on the first geophysical survey acquisition geometry, - processing (225) the first synthetic geophysical dataset for obtaining a first simulated image of the subsurface of the region of interest using a geophysical processing algorithm and an a priori subsurface model, - calculating (230) a first objective function dependent of at least a first quality index of the first simulated image of the subsurface of the region of interest.