Seismic Velocity Model Updating via Migration Scan Travel Times
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing seismic imaging technologies face challenges in accurately updating velocity models due to noisy seismic gather traces and limited maximum angle of incidence, which hinders the determination of optimal velocity models for subsurface imaging.
Innovation Solution
The method employs migration velocity scans to generate a suite of seismic images using test velocity models, allowing for the selection of an optimal velocity model based on geologic reasonableness and spatially varying choices, and iteratively updates the velocity model to match the imaging travel times from the optimal picks.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If prestack migration residual depth error is used to update velocity model, then velocity model accuracy can be improved, but the method fails when seismic gather traces are noisy or maximum angle of incidence is limited
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces migration velocity scans as an intermediary between the noisy seismic data and the velocity model updating process. Instead of directly using residual depth error from noisy gathers, the method creates a suite of migrated images using test velocity models, then uses image quality metrics (signal-to-noise ratio, image power, geological reasonableness) as intermediate indicators to select optimal velocity models. This intermediary approach filters out the noise impact and provides more reliable velocity updates.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter space from direct residual depth error measurement to image quality parameters. By evaluating multiple test velocity models and comparing their resulting images using metrics like signal-to-noise ratio, stacked image power, and geological reasonableness, the method transforms the velocity updating problem from a direct measurement task to a comparative optimization task, thereby improving reliability under noisy conditions.
2Reliability
If migration velocity scans are used to overcome noisy data limitations, then velocity model updating reliability improves, but computational complexity and processing time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the velocity model updating process into distinct stages: generating a suite of test velocity models, migrating data with each model, evaluating image quality, and selecting optimal models. This segmentation allows the complex problem to be broken down into manageable steps, where each stage can be optimized independently. The use of image quality metrics as intermediate evaluation points creates natural breakpoints in the processing workflow.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies partial action by selecting a subset of test velocity models for detailed evaluation rather than processing all possible models. The method uses image quality thresholds to identify sufficiently good models without exhaustively analyzing every possibility. This partial approach maintains reliability while reducing the computational burden of evaluating the complete parameter space.
3Manufacturing precision
If spatially varying optimal velocity choices from velocity scans are used, then velocity resolution improves, but the difficulty of accurately updating the migration velocity model increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements feedback loops where image quality metrics from migrated images are used to evaluate and select optimal velocity models. The process continuously refines the velocity model by comparing predicted images with observed data quality, using the image power, signal-to-noise ratio, and geological reasonableness as feedback signals. This iterative feedback mechanism makes the complex spatially varying updates more manageable by providing clear evaluation criteria at each step.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces direct mechanical measurement of residual depth error with an information-based system using image quality metrics. Instead of relying on direct geometric measurements from noisy gathers, the method uses computational image evaluation and statistical metrics to infer velocity model quality. This substitution transforms a difficult direct measurement problem into a more tractable information processing problem.
Data Source
AI summary
Method for updating a velocity model (926) for migrating seismic data using migration velocity scans with the objective of building a model that reproduces the same travel times that produced selected optimal images from a scan. For each optimal pick location (914) in the corresponding test velocity model (916), a corresponding location is determined (922) in the velocity model to be updated, using a criterion that the travel time to the surface for a zero offset ray (918) should be the same. Imaging travel times are then computed from the determined location to various surface locations in the update model (924), and those times are compared to travel times in the test velocity model from the optimal pick location to the same array of surface locations. The updating process consists of adjusting the model to minimize the travel time differences (934).


