Seizure Prediction via Probing Stimulation and EEG Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating seizures, such as electrical stimulation and medication, are either ineffective in stopping seizures once they have begun or require extensive time to determine their efficacy, and there is a lack of predictive capabilities for seizure onset.

Innovation Solution

Analyzing EEG signals to predict seizures through identifying seizure onset patterns and generating a predicted seizure metric, which determines a treatment electrical stimulation pattern to prevent the seizure, using a probing electrical stimulation pattern and training a patient model to improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electrical stimulation is administered to stop a seizure once it has begun, then the seizure may be stopped, but the treatment is not always effective and the reason for variability is unknown

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizure stopping effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment prediction system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of seizure types using EEG signal analysis and machine learning models before administering electrical stimulation. This preliminary action identifies the specific seizure type (e.g., supercritical Hopf, subcritical Hopf, saddle-node) and predicts responsiveness to electrical stimulation, ensuring treatment is only administered when likely to be effective, thereby improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If medication is used to reduce seizure frequency, then seizure reduction may be achieved, but it takes an inordinate amount of time (months) to gather required data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacy determinationVSAvoiddata gathering time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical/time-intensive process of manually gathering and analyzing months of seizure data with an automated machine learning model that processes real-time EEG signals. The model continuously learns from incoming data streams and provides immediate treatment efficacy assessments, substituting the slow mechanical data collection process with rapid computational analysis that delivers results in real-time rather than months.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where EEG signals are constantly monitored, analyzed by the machine learning model, and used to update treatment predictions in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to rapidly assess medication efficacy by comparing predicted versus actual seizure patterns, providing timely information without requiring months of data accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If EEG signals are analyzed in real-time to predict seizures, then prevention may be possible, but the complexity of signal processing and classification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseizure prediction accuracyVSAvoidsignal processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex seizure prediction problem into distinct classification categories based on seizure types (supercritical Hopf, subcritical Hopf, saddle-node). Each segment is handled by specialized processing pathways that analyze specific signal characteristics relevant to that seizure type. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the monolithic prediction task into manageable, specialized modules that can be processed independently and efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the prevention of seizures before they occur, enhances the effectiveness of electrical stimulation treatment, and reduces the time required to determine an effective treatment plan, providing a more precise and timely intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a probing electrical stimulation pattern may be delivered to the subject (e.g., human patient)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 2

receiving, at the signal processing device, neuronal electrical activity signal data taken from the plurality of electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Data Source

PatentUS20230052534A1Classifier of epileptic network dynamics
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US20230052534A1 patent drawing
  • US20230052534A1 patent drawing
  • US20230052534A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some embodiments, an electrical probing stimulation pattern is delivered to the brain of a subject. A response to the electrical probing is analyzed, and used to determine a type of predicted seizure. The type of predicted seizure may be used to determine a treatment electrical stimulation pattern that may be administered to prevent onset of the predicted seizure. In some embodiments, a predicted seizure metric is calculated, which, in some implementations, acts as an indicator of “distance” (e.g., probability distance) to the predicted seizure. Furthermore, a subject model may be trained to assist with determining the type of predicted seizure, and determining the treatment electrical stimulation pattern.