Selectable IOP Valve with Parallel Flow Pathways

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current glaucoma treatments, such as drainage devices, lack smart and interactive control over aqueous humor flow, leading to increased flow resistance due to fibrosis at the drainage site, which reduces their effectiveness in managing intraocular pressure (IOP).

Innovation Solution

A selectable IOP valve system with multiple parallel flow control pathways and pressure sensors that adjust drainage flow based on pressure differentials between the anterior chamber and drainage location, using a microprocessor to control valve operation and maintain optimal IOP and bleb pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a passive drainage device is implanted to relieve intraocular pressure, then IOP control is achieved initially, but flow resistance increases over time due to fibrosis at the drainage site

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIOP control effectivenessVSAvoidaqueous humor flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a controllable valve mechanism that dynamically adjusts the opening degree based on real-time pressure feedback from sensors. This allows the system to adapt to changing flow resistance conditions caused by fibrosis, maintaining optimal flow rates by opening the valve wider when resistance increases, thereby resolving the contradiction between initial effectiveness and long-term productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pressure sensors that continuously monitor IOP and drainage site pressure, feeding this information to a controller that adjusts valve opening accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism compensates for increasing flow resistance due to fibrosis, maintaining reliable IOP control despite deteriorating drainage conditions over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If drainage flow is increased to maintain IOP control, then pressure regulation improves, but fibrosis and bleb complications increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulationVSAvoidfibrosis and bleb complications
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing closed-loop pressure feedback control, the system maintains pressure regulation within target ranges without requiring excessive flow rates. The valve opens only as much as necessary to achieve target IOP, minimizing unnecessary high flow that would accelerate fibrosis and bleb complications, thus resolving the contradiction between reliable pressure regulation and harmful side effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the valve opening parameter based on real-time pressure conditions, allowing precise control of flow rates. This enables maintenance of optimal pressure regulation while avoiding sustained high flow rates that cause fibrosis and bleb complications, effectively resolving the contradiction through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single flow control pathway is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing pressure conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve system structureVSAvoidresponse to pressure differentials
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the flow control into multiple independent pathways, each with its own valve and pressure sensor. This segmentation allows the system to selectively open specific pathways based on pressure conditions, providing adaptability to different pressure scenarios while keeping each individual pathway relatively simple in structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multiple flow control pathways are designed to work together as a unified system that can respond to various pressure differential conditions. Each pathway serves multiple functions: individual flow control, pressure sensing, and collective adaptability to changing IOP conditions, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9072588B2Selectable varied control valve systems for IOP control systems
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 ALCON INC
  • US9072588B2 patent drawing
  • US9072588B2 patent drawing
  • US9072588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A selectable IOP valve for implantation in an eye of a patient controls IOP and/or bleb pressure. The valve includes a drainage tube configured to convey aqueous from an anterior chamber of an eye and includes a selectable flow control valve in fluid communication with the drainage tube and configured to control flow rates of the aqueous. The valve system includes a plurality of flow control pathways arranged to operate in parallel with each other, each of the flow control pathways being in communication with an entry port to the valve system. A flow control mechanism controls aqueous flow through the pathways. Methods and systems are also disclosed.