Selective Advertisement Viewing Enforcement With Audio Watermarks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for delivering secondary content, such as advertisements, fail to balance the needs of service providers and advertisers with subscriber satisfaction, as viewers often skip or avoid secondary content, reducing its effectiveness and subscriber engagement.

Innovation Solution

Implement methods and apparatus to selectively enforce viewing of secondary content by analyzing user interaction data, providing interactive options, and adjusting playback settings to ensure advertisements are viewed, while maintaining subscriber privacy and using existing network infrastructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If secondary content (advertisements) is delivered to subscribers, then advertiser needs are met and revenue is generated, but subscriber satisfaction decreases due to repetition, length, and inapplicability of ads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising effectivenessVSAvoidsubscriber frustration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different enforcement levels to different secondary content based on its characteristics. Some advertisements are marked as enforceable while others are not, allowing the system to optimize for both advertising effectiveness and subscriber satisfaction on a content-by-content basis rather than applying a blanket policy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The enforcement of secondary content viewing is made dynamic rather than static. The system can adjust whether trick mode functions are enabled or disabled based on real-time conditions, including the specific advertisement being delivered, subscriber behavior patterns, and contextual factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If trick mode functions are disabled to enforce advertisement viewing, then advertising effectiveness improves, but device functionality and subscriber control are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising delivery effectivenessVSAvoiddevice control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of control restriction based on the specific advertisement and subscriber behavior. Rather than permanently disabling trick mode functions, the system temporarily restricts them only when an enforceable advertisement is being delivered, and restores full functionality otherwise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors subscriber interactions with advertisements and uses this feedback to adjust future enforcement decisions. If a subscriber repeatedly views advertisements without using trick mode, the system may reduce enforcement for subsequent ads, creating a feedback loop that balances advertising effectiveness with subscriber satisfaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If secondary content is delivered repeatedly to maximize advertising impact, then advertiser objectives are met, but subscriber engagement decreases due to repetition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising impression frequencyVSAvoidsubscriber boredom
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system differentiates between various types of secondary content and applies selective enforcement only to certain advertisements rather than all secondary content. This allows high-value, non-repetitive advertisements to be enforced while permitting less critical content to be skipped

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system tracks and identifies duplicate advertisements across different time periods and delivery instances. When a duplicate is detected, the system can modify enforcement behavior, such as reducing the number of times a duplicate ad is enforced or substituting it with a different advertisement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12457372B2Apparatus and methods for selective enforcement of secondary content viewing
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US12457372B2 patent drawing
  • US12457372B2 patent drawing
  • US12457372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for selectively enforcing required insertion or viewing of secondary content, such as advertisements or promotions, in a content distribution network. In one embodiment, the network is a managed network (e.g., cable television, satellite, or the like), and the method includes identifying secondary content with a particular attribute or property (e.g., an advertisement that a user has watched before), and selectively enabling one or more “trick mode” functions relating to that secondary content. In one implementation, audio codes or watermarks are inserted into the secondary content and detected when the content is accessed or rendered; if the detected content matches a database or listing of previously played content for that user or premises, the trick mode functionality (e.g., FF or “skip”) is enabled, thereby allowing the user to bypass the content.